The Law and Jake Wade (1958)

Memorable, crazy movie

Don't Believe the Hype

It is a whirlwind of delight --- attractive actors, stunning couture, spectacular sets and outrageous parties.

The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

Released in 1958, "The Law and Jake Wade" stars Robert Taylor as the title character who was an outlaw after the Civil War, but is now a sheriff out West. A member of his former gang, Clint Hollister (Richard Widmark), won't let him start a new life and forces Jake and his fiancé (Patricia Owens) to lead him and a few other ne'er-do-wells to some buried money in a ghost town in the mountains. Unlike Jake, Clint is bad through and through and the new lawman is convinced he'll kill him after he gets the money.This Western has a lot going for it: a solid cast, particularly Taylor as Wade and Widmark as the arrogant and no-good Clint (both are convincing Westerners); utterly breathtaking Western locations, shot in Alabama Hills , Lone Pine and Death Valley National Park, California; and some fascinating ruminations on the nature of morality, evil, law, friendship and rivalry.As far as law goes, Clint argues that he killed and looted before and after the war, which society naturally considered evil, but he did the same thing during the war where the South viewed him as a faithful citizen. To him there's no difference, but Jake sees the difference in that the state of war may justify certain actions against enemies that aren't justified otherwise. Furthermore, Jake regrets his outlaw days whereas Clint has zero qualms about the evil that he wreaks.Unfortunately, there are some problems on this front that are never answered. For instance, if Jake is now a "good man" and respects law and order (which explains the movie's title) why does he foolishly break Clint out of jail at the beginning of the movie? It's revealed that he's a man of honor who's paying back a debt, but – by doing this – he releases a serious criminal to continue to commit atrocities. He even admits that he's convinced that Clint will eventually murder him, which means he knows he's incorrigible. Furthermore, in breaking Clint free of his death sentence a few guys get shot during the escape, although not killed. Isn't this a ridiculous risk even if Jake's being honorable by repaying a debt? It's not just a risk of innocent people potentially dying, but Jake's face was undisguised for all to see, which could potentially ruin his new life (more on this below). Everything points to nothing good coming from saving Clint from the hangman's rope but, then again, maybe Jake was holding on to the slightest possibility that Clint would see his good fortune and go straight. In other words, he was hoping for redemption for the man. In fact, it was presumably this very thing that turned Jake around.An aspect about the plot that I liked was the friendship AND hostility of Jake and Clint's relationship. I've experienced one significant relationship like this where it's a close friendship, but with flashes of hostility rooted in the stoo-pid rivalry of the other guy, which he can't seem to deal with. Right now we're on negative terms because I dared to confront him about something he was doing that was wrong and he didn't like it. I'm about ready to call him and say (with a Western twang), "This town's not big enough for the both of us." The main reason I'm not giving "The Law and Jake Wade" a higher rating is because of the contrived nature of certain aspects of the story and some obvious plot holes. For instance, at the beginning Jake enters the jailhouse early in the AM and the sole person guarding Clint doesn't even hear that someone entered the facility until Jake sticks a gun to his back. Why sure! Furthermore, as noted above, Jake doesn't seem to be doing a lot to disguise his identity when the town's a mere 60 miles or so from the town where he's the sheriff. Wouldn't law officers in one town be relatively known in other towns in the general region? So Jake's taking an unbelievable risk in openly breaking Clint out of jail without a disguise (a simple scarf hiding his face would've solved this issue). These types of problems in scripts – particularly old Westerns (pre-60s/70s) – insult the intelligence of viewers and loses their respect. There are numerous 50's Westerns that are guilty of these types of eye-rolling contrivances and plot holes.Nevertheless, there's definitely enough good in "The Law and Jake Wade" to give it a thumbs up, especially the two strong leads, their love/hate relationship and the fascinating explorations of good and evil, law and outlawry, friendship and rivalry. Too bad the film's glaring negatives hold it back from greatness. Still, it's one of my personal favorite Westerns. DeForest Kelley (aka Dr. McCoy) appears in a peripheral role as one of Clint's heavies.The film runs 86 minutes.GRADE: B

The film is a little too short perhaps and the love interest subplot wasn't as well developed as it could have been. However, there is a lot to recommend The Law and Jake Wade. As a western and a film, it is fine and suitably tense, and I didn't mind the Indian attacks actually, they weren't outstanding but they weren't awful that they make you think "oh god this is appalling". Plus the climax, the Comache attack on a ghost town, I thought was well choreographed. The Law and Jake Wade is beautifully photographed, and the scenery is luscious. The score is lovely as well, and I was impressed with the clever screenplay and the acting. Robert Taylor I can find dull, like in Ivanhoe(that is of course my opinion) but he has enough charisma and grit to carry the picture, and Richard Widmark is all nasty and sneering as his adversary. John Sturges's direction is superb, and the story is very well-constructed. Overall, underrated and well done, not perfect but definitely worth watching. 8/10 Bethany Cox

The film begins with a man breaking into a jail (Robert Taylor) to rescue and old friend (Richard Widmark). Oddly, however, it turns out they aren't friends any more and you know that they'll soon reunite and blood will be shed. It turns out Taylor is a sheriff and Widmark is his old partner in crime. This, sadly, is about the only twist in the film that caught me off guard.Despite having Widmark and Taylor in the leads, this is yet another tired old Western--and in so many ways practically indistinguishable from the countless number made in the 1950s. That's because the film is so predictable and takes no chances--it's only assets are the stars. Plus, since it's by-the-numbers, you know that by the end of the film, there will be the clichéd shoot-out between Taylor and Widmark. And, in between, there is the rather dull girlfriend, the "hot-headed" young punk and an attack by addle-brained Indians--who, naturally, ride past the cowboys single-file in order to give them a better chance to shoot them! My advice is find a better Western to watch. While this one isn't bad, it sure isn't good. Plus seeing a middle-aged and paunchy Taylor playing the action hero is a bit of a stretch.My advice is to find a Randolph Scott western--particularly from the 1950s--his best and most exciting period. Now those are some westerns well worth seeing.

The plot of this western, while not unusual, is reasonably well done. However, the love interest has very little to do. The scenery is excellently photographed, but the Indian attack is ridiculous. It makes no sense that the Indians did not burn the place. It was a ghost town, the wood was old and dry, and there was no one there but the people the Indians apparently were after.The best part is the handling of Jake Wade (Robert Taylor) after he's caught and being transported to the place where the money is buried. The rest of the movie is fairly dull.Altogether, a reasonable western, but it could have been a lot better.gaynor wild