10x10 (2018)

Admirable film.

Absolutely the worst movie.

A lot of perfectly good film show their cards early, establish a unique premise and let the audience explore a topic at a leisurely pace, without much in terms of surprise. this film is not one of those films.

what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

I rarely review anything but this movie was painfully bad. The woman has got to be one of the worst actresses out there. You couldnt have any feelings for her character one way or another other than just being annoyed at how bad her acting was. Ive seen no budget movies made by college kids with better acting. Maybe the end was glorious, ill never know because I could only endure about 2/3s of this movie and I probably have only skipped out on a move 3-4 times in my life. I will usually at least try to get to the end no matter how bad a movie is hoping it will get better.

Seriously, why would you have shaky cam everytime the screen pans to Luke Evans? He's mentally unstable therefore shaky cam? Gave me a damn headache. At the very least make your film watchable instead of annoying the heck out of viewers in a facile effort to appear deep. The script itself makes 0 sense, Luke can't even plan a proper kidnapping yet he's built a secret soundproof room, which doesn't even feature much at all. With a name like 10x10, you'd think the room would play some part but no, it's just some soundproof room he throws her in. Kelly's acting is decent as someone who doesn't give up. Luke meanwhile was atrocious but I think the terrible script played a big part in that. All in all, one of the poorest movies i've ever seen that wastes the talents at it's disposal. Director needs to learn to direct and writer needs to learn how to write. Not recommended.

The strengths of "10 X 10" were in the two well developed characters, the ebb-and-flow of the action, the psychodrama, and the excellent performances.The film begins with Lewis out for revenge on the woman he believes was responsible for the death of his beloved wife, Alana. Cathy-Natalie begins as the victim, but the film shifts into high gear when the crucial plot twist reveals her to be a liar and every bit as lawless and amoral as Lewis.The essential developments in the narrative are the background on the Charleston Three, who perished in a Charleston hospital. But the court ruled that the medical staff was not responsible for the deaths. Thus, Lewis is not taking the high road when he kidnaps and tortures Cathy-Natalia in the 10 X 10 room.The background on Natalie-Ann Stevens was interesting with her dysfunctional family in Green Bay, the infidelity of her father, and the tragic death of her sister, who strung herself up. Yet she clearly crosses the line when she takes on the role of vigilante in using her medical knowledge and position as a nurse at a hospital to "execute" what she deems as three miscreants. The background on Lewis is equally intriguing. Was he so gullible that he never recognized that Alana was running around behind his back? Why was he absolutely certain that Natalie-Cathy had killed his wife. Was his goal in kidnapping Natalie-Cathy only to extract the truth? Or was he seeking a pound of flesh? The film's ending left a great deal to be desired, as the filmmakers failed to provide a clear resolution about the fate of Lewis. At the very least, the physical evidence will point to Lewis as Natalie-Cathy's kidnapper. He should be facing years in prison where he will have the opportunity to contemplate the true nature of his marriage and the decision he made to toss Natalie-Cathy in his trunk.

Wasn't bad at all it could've been better actually it has a good acting good fights plot not too much but entertaining this was the first real film for director Suzi Ewing I would support her and would recommend this movie to others , keep up the good work Suzi ...