10,000 BC (2008)

Very best movie i ever watch

Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

The film may be flawed, but its message is not.

An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

There is nothing like an old fashioned slave revolt story to get you cheering. The first time I saw this film I liked it except for the part about the pyramids. They weren't around then - or were they? It got me researching and it turns out we don't really know when they were built - one millenia is as good as another. The brillant idea of mammoths used in construction explains a lot - it kind of makes sense! However I wasn't looking for historical accuracy just some entertainment. As for them speaking English in the movie - I was glad for that to enabling understanding. I wouldn't begrudge them dubbing it in other languages in other countries. Great scenery but the CGI was so so on the second viewing.

Firstly the acting was great. The landscapes were awesome. CGI maybe not the best in the history of cinematography but nonetheless very good. The story was very interesting, not the most complex so only people that read at least 10.000 books can understand, either way not the most simple one. It was right on point and it says enough so you can understand what is all about in that movie. Maybe the only complain which i would agree if i would have cared about the historical accuracy of what happened 10.000 years ago. I can understand that the history snobs get very triggered at a movie when it lacks in accuracy on historical part, but come on, do you really care about what happened 10000 years ago? I mean when a movie has a lot of inaccuracies in more recent events such as ww2 it's ok to complain, but in this case I feel like people are neatpicking. It wasn't perfect, but not how people describe it here, I feel like the grade that movie got does not fo the justice. Have a good day.

I work in history and 10,000 BC is about 5,000 years before my job really starts...still, there is a sort of Graham Hancock pseudoscience kind of fascination with the Stone Age...the Neolithic era if really want to get well...there are so many questions there that you sort of have to be interested in it...And then there is Emmerich and I really WANT to like him as a director. I mean, if you look at his body of work, they are all movies that should be really fun to watch. They all SHOULD be entertaining, even in the guilty pleasure sense and really, honestly, that is why I watch movies.It's just they hardly ever are even guilty pleasure entertaining.And 10,000 BC is no exception. It's not even the Gladiator "well we got to see Rome on the big screen" sort of worth it.You get one Mammoth that comes close to what you want to see and then it goes total Conan. Total Robert Howard kind of Hyborian Age.I don't know. Maybe I was expecting a sort of action pact over the top sort of Quest for Fire movie. Maybe that was wrong of me.You don't feel dirty walking out of it like you do with Bay films...but you don't feel entertained either.And by the time you start driving home you almost have forgotten that you've even seen it.

I really don't get why this movie has received so many negative reviews. This movie have some really well made special effects, and an awesome storyline. The story takes place in a prehistoric era approximately 10.000 years b.c. You follow a tribe of mammoth huntsmen called the Yaghal on an epic journey. The critics constantly bash this movie, for the ''poor acting'' but most people really don't care much about that, because of the fact that the acting isn't really that bad. I gave this movie 10 out of 10 stars, because i simply had a blast watching it! If you are into films about the prehistoric era I'm sure that you will appreciate this movie as much as i do! i will definitely recommend this fantastic movie to others! I also strongly recommend watching the movie in Full-HD with surround sound.