UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Adventure >

Westworld

Westworld (1973)

August. 15,1973
|
6.9
|
PG
| Adventure Western Science Fiction

Delos is a futuristic amusement park that features themed worlds—ancient Rome, Medieval times and the Old West—populated by human-like androids. After two patrons have a run-in with a menacing gunslinger in West World, the androids at Delos all begin to malfunction, causing havoc throughout the park.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Listonixio
1973/08/15

Fresh and Exciting

More
Intcatinfo
1973/08/16

A Masterpiece!

More
Huievest
1973/08/17

Instead, you get a movie that's enjoyable enough, but leaves you feeling like it could have been much, much more.

More
TrueHello
1973/08/18

Fun premise, good actors, bad writing. This film seemed to have potential at the beginning but it quickly devolves into a trite action film. Ultimately it's very boring.

More
lasttimeisaw
1973/08/19

Marrying a cutting-edge Sci-Fi concept with the horse opera, best-selling author Michael Crichton's directorial debut feature WESTWORLD is a hybrid high on ideas but woefully inadequate in its modality. In the then-near future (1983 to be specific), those who can afford $1,000 per day, per capita are privileged to stay in the Delos amusement park, which is divided into three distinctively manufactured worlds: Medievalworld, Romanworld and Westworld, peopled with human-likes androids to pander to their clientele's indulgence of every immoral and illegal whim without any consequences, that is a provocative premise to plumb how low humanity can descend to when one's action is no longer curtained by legality, but in Crichton's book, that would be too depressing, so instead, he opts for another direction, what about an inexplicable malfunction (like an endemic virus) befalls on those lifeless robots and turns them to hunt down humans? Admittedly, there is a modicum of prescience concerning our eternal dread of A.I. technology in the design, but little food for thought is left in the final product. Our proxy in this immersive adventure is the Chicagoan lawyer Peter Martin (a mustachioed Benjamin slumming it half-heartedly), a newcomer to the park accompanied by his friend John Blane (a smirky Brolin in a horrid-looking hairdo), who has patronized the place before and they choose to stay in Westworld, where those classic tropes like gunfights, bar brawl, jail break and brothel-dossing are churned out in a slapdash tepidity (one wonders how come they make absolutely no bones about sleeping with a programmed machine, however their verisimilitude of human can fool our eyes, there is something biologically repugnant here has been crassly glossed over), although the pair do cleave to the "make love not war" watchword when a trigger-happy robbery is alternatively proffered. The thrill and spill escalates when insidiously and no less mysteriously, the android revolt takes shape in all three worlds, but in the main it centers on the Gunslinger (Brynner), who is programmed to provoke quick-draw face-off, embarks on a relentless chase to finish off Peter, regardless of the damage inflicted on his physical form, a defining forefather of TERMINATOR, so is Brynner's no-blinking, no-expression stare. It goes without saying that a Sci-Fi project made in the analog era doesn't age pretty well for its ingrown reason, especially the laborious pixelated POV which looks starkly cockamamie and creaky, which explains exactly the raison d'être why its recent small-screen reboot is indeed right on time, WESTWORLD is a seam of ideas and conflicts, what we need is some visionary practitioner to mine it proper.

More
Myriam Nys
1973/08/20

It's a pretty safe bet that something awful happened to Michael Crichton as a child, while he was visiting some kind of theme or amusement park. So what did happen to him ? Did a drunken chimpanzee in a Cinderella costume try to kiss him ? Was he forced to listen to 999 consecutive renderings of the national anthem, imprisoned in an empty theatre ? Did a vending machine swallow his arm ? Was he trapped beneath an automated rosebush humming the "Flower Song" from Lakhmé ? Mauled by a poodle during a sandcastle building contest ? We'll never know, but it must have been bad.On a more positive note, Crichton dealt with his trauma in a productive way, by creating some pretty entertaining books and movies. My favorite one is "Westworld".To be fair, Westworld is not without its plot holes and inconsistencies. For instance : one might reasonably suppose that people clever enough to build strong, quick and resilient robots would be clever enough to include some serious kill switches. Sadly, this thought hadn't occurred to the many engineers, designers and maintenance men working in the park, causing them to die like particularly short-sighted flies. By the same token one might suppose that people clever enough to build a technologically advanced workplace would also be clever enough to provide a variety of safety measures and emergency exits - but nah, it's dying time again. Presumably these are the kind of persons who would organize a company barbecue in the middle of a fireworks factory.However, there is much to enjoy for viewers willing to overlook these flaws. After a somewhat clumsy beginning the movie picks up speed and the second half, which is genuinely scary and thrilling, boasts one of the most suspenseful pursuits ever filmed. Yul Brynner, silver-eyed and black-hatted, exudes pure menace as a robot who is machine enough to be relentless and human enough to bear grudges. It's a superlative and highly efficient performance. I defy anyone to watch his unnaturally even walk, rapid and unhurried both, without feeling a primeval fear.Also noteworthy are the fine locations (I, for one, particularly like the gardens of Roman World) and the unusual music, which creates an atmosphere of bone-chilling eeriness.Go get them, Yul !

More
alexanderdavies-99382
1973/08/21

There is no denying that "Westworld" is an original film and the first of its kind. Released in 1973, the film did very good business at the box office and it was the right decision to make a sequel. The scale of "Westworld" is quite small and this affects the look of the film. If a higher budget had been commissioned by "M.G.M," then the final results would have been better. There are no sets or camera shots that show the scientists entering or leaving their laboratories via any corridors. We eventually see long, dark corridors at the end of the film, so why not earlier on? There are no camera shots that show the outside of the complex where all the robots are made and repaired. Those criticisms aside, "Westworld" is still very good. The plot is kept quite simple which is an advantage. No one stands out on the acting front in particular. Even though Yul Brynner gets top billing, he doesn't have much screen time and his dialogue is limited. He adds a lot to the proceedings though when he is in the film. I enjoyed the scene when he walks along the corridors in semi darkness as he stalks his prey, it was quite atmospheric. It is a great idea in having ones own private fantasy come to life through an amusement park when everything around you has been recreated to exact specifications. Having all of that suddenly going wrong after a few of the robots begin malfunctioning, is the equivalent of being plunged into a nightmare world where the rules of survival are changed. The characters who are caught up in all this, only have their wits to keep themselves alive. At the end, the last remaining character is wondering just what on earth he has been through and if such tragic events will occur again.

More
PetarDuric
1973/08/22

Story follows many characters that have decided to arrive in amusement park Delos and there are offered to choose which world will they go in. Mainly we are focused onto Peter and John that are in West World, but there are some scenes from Medieval World. Movie introduces us into everything with very shortly and explains a lot and then as hosts start to malfunction with higher rate things get really interesting. As John and Peter enjoy themselves, on the other side everybody at Delos is trying to figure out what is going on and how should they react and couple of bad decisions have caused everything to fall apart. Problem with malfunctioning was that host were not able to be controlled and that could be connected with explanation that was given to us before, how other androids are creating androids and how they do not understand everything. Then it got wild as androids started to kill everybody and people are desperate, on the other hand John and Peter encounter Gunslinger again and this time John dies and now Peter in shock is on run for his life. After a pretty nice chase and a lot of tense scenes he managed to get into facility of Delos and discover horrifying truth that everybody is gone. There are some issues with the movie like too many information about everything and how things in Delos works, such as we are never shown where they put androids only where they repair them and some other plot holes that should be filled to our better understanding of the world. Main focus of the movie is on "rebelion" of machines and how they tend to control everything eventually killing everybody and showing how humans are not as advanced as they are with the control room scene where they got locked and didn't manage to escape which led to their deaths. Benjamin, Brolin and Brynner totally stole the whole show with some pretty nice scenes. 3/4

More