UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Adventure >

Excalibur

Excalibur (1981)

April. 10,1981
|
7.3
|
R
| Adventure Fantasy

A surreal adaptation of Sir Thomas Malory's "Le Morte d'Arthur", chronicling Arthur Pendragon's conception, his rise to the throne, the search by his Knights of the Round Table for the Holy Grail, and ultimately his death.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Scanialara
1981/04/10

You won't be disappointed!

More
KnotMissPriceless
1981/04/11

Why so much hype?

More
Ceticultsot
1981/04/12

Beautiful, moving film.

More
Jenna Walter
1981/04/13

The film may be flawed, but its message is not.

More
Kirpianuscus
1981/04/14

it is not easy to say why.and the explanation is the last detail for look for. maybe because it remains the most inspired adaptation of a story to well known.but the cause remains always a must define. and it could be, maybe , the mix of Wagner, kitsch and late romanticism. for acting. and for tension. for the great poetry of image. or , only, for the memories about a fresco about a time as fruit of myths. Excalibur remains unique. and this is the only important thing for define it. as a seductive show. maybe, as an experience. about fascination for an ambiguous past. and refuge in a world who seems out of each form of illusion. or reality.

More
Eric Stevenson
1981/04/15

Well, this is, as far as I know, the longest movie ever made based on Arthurian legend. Looking at the back of the box, I realize that it's based on a book called "Le Morte Darthur". I had no idea that Arthurian legend was contained in a single book or at least not as much of it in a book. I guess I'm not that familiar with the legends, but from what I did know, it was interesting to see it all come alive in this movie! Yes, this had everything I knew about King Arthur including the sword and the stone, the round table, Merlin, Morgan le Fey, and Mordred. I got everything I knew about them.The costumes and lighting effects were brilliant in this movie! For a movie named after the weapon, it wasn't entirely about it. Instead, we got everything we know from the classic stories. There wasn't much of an attempt to be elaborate or anything. I especially like Mordred's armor. I guess in that sense, it wasn't really that unique. It didn't offer anything that new to the story, but it didn't need to. It's simply a very fine looking film that holds up. I remember a time when 1981 wasn't that long ago. I loved Patrick Stewart too. ***

More
mark.waltz
1981/04/16

Whether it is "Camelot", "The Sword and the Stone" or Monty Python's "Holy Grail" or "Spamelot", the stories of King Arthur and his knights, the round table, Guinevere and Lancelot or the search for the holy grail remain all encompassing epics. The same year that a revival of" Camelot" appeared on Broadway, an epic non-musical appeared on movie screens. It remains a cult favorite, and now 35 years old, I can see why.Told from the times before King Arthur's conception, this shows Merlin's (Nicol Williamson) influence on the one and future king. It's as sinister as anything in mid-evil history, involving black magic as a fight against good and evil, showing how dark these dark ages really were. Going from young peasant unaware of his destiny to aged king fighting against his own son, Nigel Terry is totally commanding. Helen Mirren is bewitching as the evil Morgan La Fey, given understandable motives for her evils. Cherie Lunghi is tender and sultry as Guenivere. Violent but not excessively bloody, thus fortunately has the spectacle if not the loud noises of modern epics. This Camelot becomes a character itself, gorgeous and flowery when Arthur is in full charge of that spot that for one brief moment was righteous, and drab and lifeless when going through the sinister plotting of Morgan Le Fey and her Caligula like son, Mordred. This is difficult to perfect upon and makes me shake my head at Hollywood for even suggesting that it needs an updating.

More
calvinnme
1981/04/17

... after all she witnesses what amounts to the rape of her own mother, and then sees the product of that rape inherit a kingdom (Nigel Terry as Arthur Pendragon). Of course she wants revenge, and justice in the most ironic way for what happened to her mother. Let me explain.Uther Pendragon has peace, has his throne, has a truce with the duke of Cornwall. At a dinner celebrating the truce, Cornwall shows off his beautiful wife, Igrayne. Uther ruins the truce in an unspeakable breach of etiquette by going for Igrayne right there in front of everybody. Hostilities rebegin. Uther begs Merlin to let him have Igrayne by the spell of making so that he looks like her husband, Cornwall. Apparently it was the custom for husbands and wives to have sex in front of their toddler children, and furthermore Uther does not even bother to take his armor off during the act! That's what I mean by rape - Igrayne is being duped into having sex with Uther Pendragon. Morgana, Cornwall and Igrayne's child, looks on, sees through the spell of making, and also envisions her father dying on the battlefield throughout her mother's rape. This is something she never forgets.With Cornwall dead, Uther takes Igrayne for his own, and nine months later she gives birth to a child - Uther's from the rape. But, alas, Uther promised to give Merlin anything that came from his deception, so he must turn over the child, Arthur Pendragon, to Merlin. Uther decides a deal is not a deal, and pursues Merlin and the child, only to be killed by Cornwall's vengeful troops who are still hanging about. Merlin thrusts Excalibur into a stone and proclaims whoever shall draw the sword from the stone will be king. Why do the people keep listening to this guy? I guess the fact that he could turn anybody into a toad is part of it.Time passes, Arthur grows up looking and acting like nobody special (Nigel Terry), and is assisting Kay, a knight in a tournament whose sword is stolen. Arthur just sees the sword in the stone, does not know its significance, and just pulls it out to give to Kay. Merlin announces that Arthur has accidentally pulled Excalibur from the stone and he is king.Well it turns out that more than just the communist peasants in Monty Python's Holy Grail believe that pulling a sword from a stone is not the basis for an acceptable form of government, and Arthur has to work to solidify his kingdom. In the process, he marries Guenevere, daughter of one of his allies, and convinces Lancelot to join him. But Lancelot and Guenevere fall for one another, finally giving in to their feelings. When Arthur comes upon their post coital slumber he plunges Excalibur into the ground and wanders off broken.Now all of this time Morgana (Helen Mirren) is still bitter about her mother's rape and the product of that rape, Arthur, getting a throne because of her mother being deceived. She tricks Merlin into revealing the spell of making, traps him in a crystal, and then decides turnabout is fair play. She makes herself appear as Guenevere, causing Arthur to think his queen has returned to him, and he sleeps with her, conceiving an incestuous child. This child grows to manhood and challenges Arthur for his throne, which is easier than it would normally be because Arthur would have to kill his own son/nephew, plus the land has become barren and the people are starving because nothing grows from the ground, blaming the king. So how does all of this turn out? Watch and find out. This film is very atmospheric. Nicol Williamson steals the show as Merlin with his odd glances and one liners and looking very "unmagician" like at times. If he hadn't played a complete tool in "I'm Dancing as Fast as I Can" a year later, I might still like seeing him in this role.So what have we learned here today? Crime does not pay, the career options are not good for queens who commit adultery, and bitter half siblings can really mess up your life if you give them the chance. Recommended.

More