UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Horror >

The Exorcist III

The Exorcist III (1990)

August. 17,1990
|
6.5
|
R
| Horror Mystery

On the fifteenth anniversary of the exorcism that claimed Father Damien Karras' life, Police Lieutenant Kinderman's world is once again shattered when a boy is found decapitated and savagely crucified.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Executscan
1990/08/17

Expected more

More
Acensbart
1990/08/18

Excellent but underrated film

More
Donald Seymour
1990/08/19

This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

More
Rexanne
1990/08/20

It’s sentimental, ridiculously long and only occasionally funny

More
BA_Harrison
1990/08/21

One might imagine that, after the debacle that was The Exorcist II, the franchise would have returned to the head-spinning and vomit spewing of the original, but to writer/director William Peter Blatty's credit, he tries something a little different with The Exorcist III, his film's serial killer plotline more akin to The Silence of the Lambs for much of the time. The nearest the film comes to William Friedkin's 1973 classic is with the brief special effects laden exorcism scene in the final act, which was forced upon Blatty by the film's producers.The majority of the film sees George C. Scott's cop Kinderman investigating several gruesome murders that mimic the modus operandi of The Gemini Killer, who was executed in the electric chair fifteen years earlier. Kinderman's enquiries lead him to cell eleven of a secure hospital ward where a patient who resembles dead priest Father Damien Karras claims that he is the Gemini Killer, having possessed Karras's body as he died.Sadly, as original as the majority of this film is, it also proves frustratingly dull for much of the time, with a glut of exposition heavy dialogue, an extremely slow pace, and only one decent scare (the much lauded hospital hallway scene) to keep the viewer from nodding off. As out-of-place as the studio sanctioned exorcism undeniably is, at least it's entertaining, which is more than I can say about George C. Scott's character complaining about a carp in his bath.

More
OllieSuave-007
1990/08/22

This movie gives off another meaning of being possessed, where a mental patient is possessed by the evil spirit of a serial killer. He mysteriously beings a reign of terror, and a police lieutenant tries desperately to solve the murders and crack the mystery.This is quite a good piece of horror cinema with a lot of tension and thrills, from the doom and gloom atmosphere surrounding the downtrodden, murders, and rage to the demon action. The latter, though, was limited throughout the movie. Much of the film is about solving the crimes, in a gloomy-type atmosphere that makes this movie look like a film-noir type setting.There's some good and intense acting and some devilish frightening scenes, including the "creature-in-the-white-robe" scene. Not a bad horror sequel overall.Grade B

More
Sarah Carlton
1990/08/23

Nowadays, sequels are terribly frowned upon. They're infamous for being cheaply made only with the intent to grab money from people with the promise that it'll be just as good as the original. I had purposely skipped The Exorcist II because I had heard that it was laughably bad and not worth watching whatsoever. And initially, I wasn't even going to see this one. But I'm sure glad I did.George C. Scott plays the protagonist: a detective who's investigating a string of murders that are uncannily similar to the Gemini Killer case; a serial murderer who's victims are killed in grotesque and sinister ways. But there's only one problem: The Gemini killer was supposedly sentenced to death 15 years earlier, so he's left to figure out how he's able to kill again. Without giving anything away about the plot, I will tell you that the Gemini Killer is played by a phenomenal actor who I'm personally a fan of. Brad Dourif appears in only two scenes in this entire film, but damn do they stand out. He is absolutely enthralling. Dourif is able to invoke such rage, ferocity and insanity without coming off as completely over-the-top. He subtly creates a tragic yet terrifying complex of personality traits embodied into a mesmerizing performance. It was an absolute delight to watch him in the film.Thankfully there are other things to like about this film aside from Dourif's amazing performance. There are several well shot scenes that are just as disturbing as they are compelling. The last act in particular had me on the edge of my seat: it's the most tense I've ever been while watching a film in a long time. With that said, I wouldn't exactly classify it as a "horror" film so much as a suspense/crime drama. But it still has some fairly creepy moments.However, one thing that disappointed me was George C. Scott's acting in the lead role. Being such a seasoned and well experienced actor at this point in his career, you'd think that he could never give a bad performance. But unfortunately, he does in The Exorcist III. If you looked up "chewing the scenery" in the urban dictionary, I'm almost positive you would find his name there. Scott poorly delivered so many lines that I would actually find myself laughing during some scenes, but for all of the wrong reasons. Now to be fair, this may be the fault of William Peter Blatty who at best, was an amateur behind the camera. And clearly he was better at writing than he was at directing. He may have given Scott unclear or vague instructions which caused Scott to become confused and just wing it as best he could. Also, I should mention that not all of Scott's scenes are bad, but had a more experienced director been on set, things might have worked out differently. Scott's less than par acting in this film is the reason why I won't give it a higher rating than a 7.But overall, it's a great film that really exceeded my expectations, especially in the last two acts. It's as good as sequels come and I would recommend it to fans of the original film. One thing that people might find surprising is that it actually ties into the first Exorcist film rather well. I believe it's worth watching for Brad Dourif alone, but there's some additional scenes in the film that are also worth checking out. It's not everyone's cup of tea, but if you keep an open mind this film will definitely shock you.

More
jacobjohntaylor1
1990/08/24

Don't get me wrong the first two Exorcist movie are very scary. But The Exorcist III is scarier. This movie has great acting. This movie also has great special effects. This movie also has a great story line. IF you like really scary movies then you need to see this movie. See all The Exorcist movies. They are some of the best horror movie ever. I all The Exorcist movies are most sees. This movie is a classic. See this movie. I need more lines and I am running of thing to say. In this one has one of the actor from the original Exorcist. Jason Miller is in this one. Exorcist the beginning is better. Dominion a prequel to The Exorcist is also better. But still this is a very good movie. All the Exorcist movies are great.

More