UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Drama >

The Man from Elysian Fields

The Man from Elysian Fields (2001)

September. 13,2001
|
6.6
| Drama Romance

A failed novelist's inability to pay the bills strains relations with his wife and leads him to work at an escort service where he becomes entwined with a wealthy woman whose husband is a successful writer.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

UnowPriceless
2001/09/13

hyped garbage

More
ThedevilChoose
2001/09/14

When a movie has you begging for it to end not even half way through it's pure crap. We've all seen this movie and this characters millions of times, nothing new in it. Don't waste your time.

More
Verity Robins
2001/09/15

Great movie. Not sure what people expected but I found it highly entertaining.

More
Matylda Swan
2001/09/16

It is a whirlwind of delight --- attractive actors, stunning couture, spectacular sets and outrageous parties.

More
cashman1955
2001/09/17

The only reason to see this, and it's a considerable reason, is to watch Mick Jagger. He is absolutely pitch perfect in his role as the head man of the gigolo combine. His scene with Anjelica Houston, in which he tries to tell her she is more than just a client ... well, it's a scene we have watched before with the sexes reversed ... when a "john" has fallen for a hooker ... but to see it played in reverse is very touching.Not a fan of Margolies, so ... whatever. I like Garcia, but I just don't think this was a good role for him. Never liked Coburn, and that hasn't changed.Anyway, rent it and watch Jagger.

More
andreas-schmidt-pabst
2001/09/18

It makes me wonder that the makers of a movie in which there are so much comments about good and bad writing aren't able to use these criteria for their script. This movie has got no straight story line. I mean, what it's about? Literature, love, sex, all together? Well, nothing of it works well. There is no structure, no development, no climax and no satisfying end.I was very surprised, when I've read that this was meant to be a tragic comedy, because it wasn't funny at all. Neither it was demanding, thrilling or erotic, not to mention that there was no action in it.The characters are one-dimensional at the best, non defined or annoying. Concerning the part of Mick Jagger I soon asked myself, what his function was, after all. Also Byron's wife and her dad lose meaning for the story very soon.After all a waste of time that made me ask two things: 1. Had been dilettantes at work? 2.Who goes to cinema to watch stuff like that?

More
rowmorg
2001/09/19

Being a nobody whose name does not come up in a Google search and a failed writer of bits of TV series, Lasker should have written a much more authoritative portrait of his alter ego, Byron Tiller. Instead there are several basic errors that the director or producer should have avoided in Lasker's script. They have nothing to do with budgetary restrictions. With so many films having been written about writers, by writers, it seems incredible that they should still be produced with fundamental faults that would never be tolerated, for example, in a script about lawyers by a lawyer like John Grisham. First, no failed novel is remaindered after seven years. More like six months. So the film starts out with a false premise. Second, a writer who has produced nothing significant for seven years does not maintain a professional office in downtown Pasadena, even in a second-rate building. He works in his spare room, just like tens of thousands of other writers who consider themselves to be doing quite well. Being able to maintain his own office, he therefore has no motivation to take up a type of work that evidently repels him and the plot loses credibility. The successful writer who later features in the story admits that Tiller "might be right" when Tiller calls him "a genius", and yet the riches enjoyed by genius seldom accord with literary preeminence but with bestsellerdom and the two are linked only rarely, compare e.g. the comparative economic status of J.K.Rowling (incredibly rich) and, say, Terry Southern (incredibly poor), or even John Kennedy Toole who, despairing of ever being published, killed himself before his 'Confederacy of Dunces' won all the prizes. If this film had been more accurate about the literary business, it would have been a better work of art. Incidentally, the odd relationship between the three main characters when they go public was very common in European high society, where rich old men often had young noble wives. It was socially permissible for them to have a young admirer in tow, as long as the niceties were observed. He was called a "cavaliere servente", and another literary notable, George Gordon Lord Byron, played this role for several years in 19th century Tuscany. Another odd literary set-up was the household of Aldous Huxley, where his wife, who was bisexual, would screen his young female admirers horizontally before ushering them into the Presence.

More
daygc
2001/09/20

With a ridiculous premise such as that in The Man from Elysian Fields, only superior writing, casting, or special effects (or a miracle) could produce a watchable film, let alone a good one. Sadly, this flop by director George Hickenlooper (whose credits include, uh, . . . well, we're still waiting for something creditable) wasn't rescued by any of these, and we are all just left to wonder why on Earth this film was made.Writer Byron Tiller (Garcia) is a deservedly down-and-out writer who somehow manages to snag a real gem for a wife. Dena Tiller (Julianna Margulies) is pretty, intelligent, long-suffering, attentive, and downright charitable in her marriage to Byron, whose only published work is a (coincidentally?) unbelievable novel entitled Hitler's Child. (I happen to agree with the bookstore patron who, after laughing hysterically at the book's premise - which even Tiller acknowledges is 'ridiculous' - and after realizing she is talking to the author politely asks that he autograph it, then promptly dumps it back in the discount bin after he leaves.)Why Byron decides to turn tricks instead of flipping burgers or going to night school to learn another profession is not clear. The fact that after sleeping with the multiple Pulitzer Prize winner Tobias Alcott's (James Coburn) young wife he is asked to co-write the aging author's next book is mind boggling for several reasons, the most obvious being that Alcott never sees any of Tiller's writing before making this generous offer. He simply endures some criticism from Tiller on his work in progress, then decides that the criticism is SO GOOD that he must have Tiller co-author the work with him. If Tiller's luck was this good for real he a) might have a successful novel of his own, or b) might not have ever met Luther Fox, the enigmatic man from Elysian Fields.Which brings us to the crux of the plot. Luther Fox (Jagger) is the aging founder and president of the Elysian Fields Escort Service, a haven for rich women with inattentive husbands. Somehow, for some inexplicable reason, Fox not only notices his across-the-hall neighbor's smoldering good looks, but also takes the time to read the aforementioned bomb-novel, Hitler's Child.' (We can only assume that the quality of this work is what makes Fox assume that Tiller would come to work for him.) Tiller's conversion is way too quick. He does some superficial soul searching before diving into the world of male prostitution. Forget for the moment that he doesn't have to do any old hags, homosexuals, or kinky kooks, and that his only client is the young, beautiful, and charming Andrea Alcott (Olivia Williams.). Also forget that he is presumably paid very well. But try as we might, we just can't forget how easily this supposedly decent guy becomes embroiled in the lifestyle of the Elysian Fields set. We are expected to swallow the surface excuse given, that Tiller is willing to sacrifice (!) so much for his beloved wife and child. What a guy! We have to wonder why, when his altruistically driven wife would gladly go to work so they could both flip burgers to make ends meet, Tiller is such easy prey for Fox. We won't ever know, of course. We just have to accept, as Tiller himself says about his own flop of a novel, 'Premises are allowed to be ridiculous.' Right. Is that George Hickenlooper's excuse for making this film?Lastly, we turn to the character of Luther Fox himself. Our patience for imagination already stretched paper thin, we now have to contend with the panderer-turned-paramour, the man from Elysian Fields. Admitting that he is over the hill and should have retired years ago, Luther stays active on the job for one client: the rich and morally bankrupt Jennifer Adler (Angelica Huston.) Fox has been in love with his client for some time, and eventually proposes marriage, said proposal being immediately and hysterically rebuffed. Why we take this side trip is unclear because Adler drops out of the picture immediately thereafter. Luther decides to get out of the business anyway, and advises Tiller to do the same. Tiller's wife has already learned of his moonlighting activities and left him , so this advice comes under the 'too little, too late' category. And we won't even get into the absurdity of Tiller's wife, Dena, hiring one of the Elysian Field escorts so she can just ask him why a man would do this sort of work - we probably wouldn't get it anyway. To try and tie up this clunker into a neat ending, the screenwriter (Phillip Jason Lasker of notable masterpieces for TV Barney Miller and The Golden Girls) has Tiller working as a waiter - and a snotty one, at that - in a fancy restaurant, which begs the question as to why he didn't go this route in the first place. Mostly this comes about because Tiller gets gypped out of his share of the profits from the co-written Alcott novel, and has to seek honest, non-prostitution work to survive. No matter - it is hinted that Dena is going to take him back anyway and the film mercifully ends there. Fox walks off into the night, and really, who cares?Want to save $3.75? Watch The Golden Girls reruns - they're way better.

More