UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Documentary >

Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup

Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup (2009)

September. 22,2009
|
7.1
|
NR
| Documentary

With the departure of the Bush Administration and the arrival of an “era of transparency,” opportunities are arising for the disclosure of new information that may shed more light on the events that took place before and after 9/11/2001. Loaded with powerful, new footage and in-depth interviews this documentary presents a wide array of evidence both known and unknown…until now.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

SunnyHello
2009/09/22

Nice effects though.

More
Stellead
2009/09/23

Don't listen to the Hype. It's awful

More
Ariella Broughton
2009/09/24

It is neither dumb nor smart enough to be fun, and spends way too much time with its boring human characters.

More
Geraldine
2009/09/25

The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

More
frosty_muggs01
2009/09/26

I watched this "documentary" recently, and boy, what a piece of junk. The movie makers just throw out all kinds of pretty-much random stuff. One thing that cracked me up - they talked about the people that were on the flight that hit the Pentagon... some of them worked for the ARMY, NAVY and many of them worked for LOCKHEED and BOEING!!!! Really? So people that worked in the Washington DC area had some connection to either the military or military contractors? WHAT A SHOCKER!!! Oh but wait, almost within the same breath the "film" is telling us that the Pentagon was not hit with a commercial aircraft. So which is it? Was the plane filled with DOD and contractor personnel, or did a missile hit the Pentagon? And what about the eyewitnesses on the ground that SAW a plane flying low and into the Pentagon?Then there's the WTC issues. The 2nd plane that hit the WTC crashed into it very close to a corner of the building. Very soon after that, it's PLAINLY seen that about the upper 1/3 of the building was leaning over. If anyone thinks that a structure can have 1/3 of it's weight shifted like that and STILL remain upright.... well, such a person obviously lacks common sense. Sure enough, that building was the first of the 2 to fall.Anyway, this movie is so ridiculous in it's omissions. I know there are other documentaries that debunk this movie. I'd definitely recommend that no one waste their time watching this garbage because it's so full of untruths and contradictions. You can ALWAYS tell that movies like this are a piece of crap - if they could rely on the truth to convince us, they'd merely tell the truth. But they can't do that - they tell half-truths, they leave out all kinds of proved facts, they give one version of the story when there are hundreds of people that can give another version.... sheer silliness is what this amounts to.

More
Tcarts76
2009/09/27

This "documentary" is a turd. Plain and simple. Much like the Kennedy assassination people will believe whatever it is they want to believe. Case in point. Our Government can't even build a functioning website with an army of people and $600 million dollars to do it with. In an age of all out social media, the internet, and 24 hour news cycles this garbage just proves that the human race, especially people who believe this "inside Job" crap, are getting dumber by the day.Let's look at another conspiracy and how dumb people are. When crop circles first started popping up in England everyone thought they were made by UFO's. Idiots everywhere came out in their tin foil hats marveling at how no human could have done something like this over night with out anyone seeing or hearing anything. Whole crazy people industries started popping up around this. Suddenly, 2 old British dudes came out and said they had been the ones making them. They showed how they did it, and how they did it so fast, and their demonstrations came out as perfect replicas of the "UFO" ones. Not being able to do something that big and that fast turned out to be entirely possible and only needed 2 old pranksters, 2 wooden planks, and two pieces of rope. Still their are idiots running around refusing to believe that, still say it is ufo's and using all sorts of technology to claim radiation is being emitted from them and every thing else. Grow up and put on your big girl panties believers, truthers, or what ever you call yourselves. At least the Kennedy conspiracy was a small bit believable since most theories talked about a few guys on the grassy knoll. For 9/11 to be an inside job would have taken hundreds of people to be perfectly organized which if you have ever human beings at work, you know that is just impossible.

More
dorkchop56
2009/09/28

Well we obviously have a graduate from the Micheal Moore School of Documentaries here. This is the biggest piece of crap I have watched that wasn't his. I would say this is full of lie after lie but that wouldn't be true...they sprinkle in some half truths and a lot of "Huh? what's that got to do with anything?" You can't really blame them though, as when your premise is so absurd it doesn't leave you a lot to work with. They even go to the steel doesn't melt absurdity(how is it made then you genius). Two pictures of "the same area", but having completely different landmarks. Lies of when Bush was told about the towers falling, omissions of important facts like the short times the flights were in the air(by design), explosions from the "bottom of the buildings" while they show video of the buildings falling from the top(take a physics class moron), an "interview" with someone from the Department of Agriculture that supposedly had an odd conversation with one of the hijackers that was never reported(and no video of her saying any of it), and a general naiveté of life in general. They quote few to none of their "sources", except the left wing nut jobs that have the same no proof that they have. This is a slap in the face to anyone with common sense, the people that died on that horrible day, their families, and to be honest the United States of America. They should be ashamed of themselves, and should not claim to be Americans. This work of fiction could be considered a comedy, as most of it is so laughable, if it weren't for the screaming you will do at the TV for being insulted, and the huge crap they take on America and the families affected. A don't mind a dissenting view in a documentary or otherwise, but it should be at least close to fact based. This lacks anything that could be considered fact, and leaves you scratching your head wondering if anyone is dumb enough to believe any of this to the point of putting this mindless drivel on film and releasing it. Please, if you watch this, use your brain on the pathetic obvious things, and do research on the rest before you look as dumb as these film makers in public.

More
smfilm
2009/09/29

Dylan Avery comes out with the 5th iteration of his paranoid mega extrapolated impression of the collapse of WTC1 and 2 in order to continue to enrich himself. He has now turned his conspiracy idea into a decade long career... a suspicious feat in it's own right.The Press is supposed to be about informing the electorate in an unbiased way.... Dylan Avery is as far from the press as is conceivable... Why did he need 5 iterations? Because he needed to keep his meal ticket going every time someone proved it to be a farce.Loose change's citations have changed significantly over the years as they've become increasingly obvious fabrications or contextually flawed, so he's had to change them constantly to dodge the truth.Avery is outright playing on human psyche to try to say whatever he wants to say to get the most hits on the internet.... he basically hit the lottery by telling an unbelievably BS story. The film's message remains the same though: If you don't agree with the extremely biased conspiracy view, which focuses on partial or out of context information desperately assembled to keep his 15 minutes going... then you, the viewer, must be stupid.In fact, this version's narration repeatedly takes a manipulative, berating, and sarcastic tone toward the viewer, in essence declaring you a 'non-believer' and idiot if you have any momentary thoughts calling into question their conspiracy. There is a wealth of counterpoint to this supposed 'documentary' that you can read by googling 'debunk loose change' ... read with an open mind the entire record, then make your own decision about tube-in-tube construction susceptibility to relatively low temperature fires and the like....It's amazing that Avery can create and refine this piece of propaganda in order to enrich himself for so long and that the masses continue to eat it up without reading for themselves.... but: There's a sucker born every minute.... oh and I would bet that most who disagree with my view here reading this think PT Barnum said that... wrong again....

More