Last Harem (1999)

Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Powerful

hyped garbage

Fresh and Exciting

Strange film. The story of a historical "Fall", the fall of the Ottoman Empire. It makes you immediately think of movies by the gigantic Luchino Visconti such as "Ludwig" and "The Damned" (the original title translates as "The Fall of the Gods"). Dark colors, morbid atmospheres, perturbations, homosexuality open or veiled. And so on. And the story is good, well thought of. But unfortunately narrated too quickly and in a too confused way. To understand it (and again not completely) one must know well history and traditions of the Ottoman Empire, or at least of its last decades. What is really a Harem, which are the relationships of power between one woman and the others, why a very few of them become powerful and others remain behind, what's the position of the Valide, what it means for a woman to bear a male child to the Sultan, why exactly the small child of the main character is poisoned, why near the end the possible poisoner, the favorite of the Sultan, has to go with her son to Salonika? Because she must follow Abdul Hamit 2 in his exile, but one must know it by himself, the movie does not give any explanation whatsoever. All in all a good film, but could have been much better

This story is a complex and wonderful tale of the last Harem of the Ottoman empire, well told and provoking we see the inner workings of a world now gone, and learn about the people who lived there.I enjoyed the story, characters, acting and scenes. A few scenes suffered from quick editing and the sub titles sometimes disappeared too quickly, otherwise a wonderful piece.The main character Safiya is played wonderfully by Marie Gillain who I am pleased to say did a fantastic job without over doing it. The scenes with her and Alex Descas (Nadir) are charming and lovely.I recommend this film for anybody looking to watch something less Hollywood and more authentic to the world they are emulating.

I had high expectations when I watched this movie. Being in the Harem I thought there would be extravagant sets and beautiful clothings. Well, I was wrong. Instead the colours used were dark most of the time, The clothings were nice but too plain. The lighting was constantly inadequate, making me very bored.As for the story, I could not possibly follow the story. To me it seems that there were so many subplots and hence very confusing. I was also confused about how an eunoch could have sex with a woman. This film is not my cup of tea.

Harem Suare, tells the tale of the impossible love between the Sultan's prefered girl and one of the eunuch's (castrated harem servant) from the Harem of the previous Ottoman Empire. With his Occidental eye, Ferzan Ozpetek once again describes a mysterious place (as in "Hamam"), offering a "documentary of the soul" through a game of mirros, two-faced personalities, creating a cross-cultural confrontation on myth, sexuality, and language. Set in Istanbul in 1904, just before the fall of the Ottoman Empire and with revolution already at the door of the Yildiz Palace, it's the story of Safiye played by Marie Gillain(Mon Pere Ces Hero), an Italian girl who was bought by a pasha in the slave market at Cairo and given to Sultan Abdulhamit as a present. There, with the help of the black eunuch Nadir (Alex Descas), she rises quickly in the harem to become Abdulhamit's favourite. The Sultan likes to listen to Verdi's La Traviata, but can't stand the unhappy ending - so he asks Safiye to rewrite the libretto for him... Regarding The Last Harem the director offers these comments: "With a Westerner's eye I'm trying to unravel one of the most crucial knots of my original culture: the end of the Ottoman Empire, portrayed in one of the places dearest to the imagination - the harem:" Ferzan Özpetek became a film-maker after working as an assistant to Ricky Tognazzi and other Italian directors. His two features (Hamam, Harem Suare) to date seek to bridge the Western and Oriental cultures.