UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Drama >

First Monday in October

First Monday in October (1981)

August. 21,1981
|
6.4
|
R
| Drama Comedy

For the first time in history a woman is appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court, where she becomes a friendly rival to a liberal associate.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Derry Herrera
1981/08/21

Not sure how, but this is easily one of the best movies all summer. Multiple levels of funny, never takes itself seriously, super colorful, and creative.

More
Portia Hilton
1981/08/22

Blistering performances.

More
Allison Davies
1981/08/23

The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

More
Hattie
1981/08/24

I didn’t really have many expectations going into the movie (good or bad), but I actually really enjoyed it. I really liked the characters and the banter between them.

More
SimonJack
1981/08/25

The proximity of the film, "First Monday in October," to the actual first female justice to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court is uncanny. Others have surmised how President's Reagan's announcement of Sandra Day O'Connor for the high bench (July 7, 1981) may have helped draw interest and attendance at this movie. The film debut was Aug. 21. Two days earlier, Reagan had submitted his formal nomination of O'Connor. No doubt, the film was still playing in theaters when the Senate confirmed her by a 99-0 vote on Sept. 21. This movie was based on a stage play that had a short run some time earlier. This might have been an interesting peek at the court and its first woman (fictional here, of course), but the script is so wishy- washy. The bones of contention in the film are weakly scripted. They seem so lame and might lead one to wonder why we have a Supreme Court at all. Now, had there been some issues with real substance, the plot might have been saved. Well, the writers and movie makers tried to drum up some interest with dialog that argued freedom of speech and differing views between members of the court. This and related confrontations were the "meat" of the story carried mostly by the two leads, Walter Matthau and Jill Clayburgh. The few humorous lines injected a little life into the film, but they were too mile and too few. The leads were fair with the material they had. But they might have put more energy into their roles as justices Dan Snow and Ruth Loomis. The best one can expect from this film is some light humor and an inside look at the Supreme Court building In Washington, D.C.

More
romanorum1
1981/08/26

President Ronald Reagan's appointment of Sandra Day O'Connor as the first woman Supreme Court Justice in the USA in 1981 may have inspired this movie even though the original play was several years earlier. Jill Clayburgh stars as the unattached, conservative, and sprightly Ruth Loomis from California who remains undaunted as the new Justice. Co-star Walter Matthau (Dan Snow) is the cantankerous, veteran liberal Justice with whom she repartees on various legal issues. Obviously there are long dialog scenes. Snow is an advocate of free speech and expression. "I'll defend everybody's right to speak and every man's right to be wrong!" he exclaims. Snow also rails, "There are only eight of us left against all of her." There is one odd exchange delivered by Justice Loomis during her confirmation: "The F.B.I. is wrong in reporting to you that I have no children. Ideas are my children, and I have hundreds of them." Yikes! But, exhibiting good chemistry, both stars are at the top of their game. Clayburgh and Matthau are both quick-witted and likable. The movie was shot on location in the District of Columbia and also in California. As the plot is rather thin, the acting carries the movie. It is not bad, but it is also no classic.

More
bkoganbing
1981/08/27

Though First Monday In October didn't last too long on Broadway, the Jerome Lawrence-Robert E. Lee play made one fine sparkling movie for Walter Matthau and Jill Clayburgh taking over the roles that Henry Fonda and Jill Alexander did on the stage.In 1978 when this was on stage, the iconoclastic William O. Douglas had been gone three years from the Supreme Court and the idea of a woman justice was yet untried. So imagine the serendipitous joy with the producers when Ronald Reagan added Sandra Day O'Connor to the court. You couldn't buy better publicity.Matthau is clearly based on William O. Douglas who was a far seeing advocate for social justice and change on the bench. Matthau if you can believe is a kinder, gentler version of Douglas. In real life Douglas was not a nice guy, in fact personally he was a swine. The banter with which you see him engage his law clerk James Stephens would never happen, he went through law clerks like he did wives. Ditto with Jan Sterling playing Mrs. Matthau. The first Mrs. Douglas had taken a hike years earlier and Douglas was on wife number 4 in her twenties at this time. He died in 1980.O'Connor replaced Potter Stewart in 1981 on the bench so in real life these two never served. Still First Monday In October you'd like to think would be how they got along with even a little romance thrown in once the two got to know each other. Douglas never got along with colleagues, especially those who had a different point of view.Still Matthau is one of his patented curmudgeons and Clayburgh do have a good cinema chemistry which makes First Monday In October a pleasant piece of viewing.

More
moonspinner55
1981/08/28

The U.S. Supreme Court elects its first Madam Justice, an attractive, widowed judge from California; the first issue on the docket is whether a Nebraska zealot pining for family values can ban a pornographic film (it's title: "The Naked Nymphomaniac"). Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee's script, based upon their play, is cognizant of the effects of a female voice on the Supreme Court, but doesn't give Jill Clayburgh's Ruth Loomis anything but obvious points to make. She is Woman, hear her Roar! The cutesy repartee with fellow Justice Snow (an uncomfortable-seeming Walter Matthau) matches the women's-lib quips and retorts; no matter how truthful Loomis' arguments may be, everything in this version is underlined with whimsy. It's a poor substitute for strong political comedy, coming off more like a Hepburn-and-Tracy cast-off unearthed in an old filing cabinet. *1/2 from ****

More