Mr. Orchid (1946)

I like movies that are aware of what they are selling... without [any] greater aspirations than to make people laugh and that's it.

When a movie has you begging for it to end not even half way through it's pure crap. We've all seen this movie and this characters millions of times, nothing new in it. Don't waste your time.

It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

My summary says all of my point of view. It goes even over the top, for a really excellent piece of propaganda should not be understood as propaganda… But since all the reviewers pointed that this movie, made just at the end of the war, was sugar-coating French supposed general behaviour during the war and German occupation, it's maybe time to speak about the film itself.Though naive, it's a compelling story, extremely well shot and acted. Noël Noël, Paul Frankeur and above all Nadine Alari --I discover this very talented young woman-- are touching and in tune all along the reels.René Clément shows his mastery in the filming, angles, movements and composition.And the last scene before the epilogue, when father and son are meeting again, is an absolute tear-jerker.Have a break, indulge yourself in watching Le Père tranquille. You won't regret those 90 minutes.

At a superficial level this could be dismissed as Pimpernel Smith with a French accent. Leslie Howard beat Noel-Noel to the punch and, if you have a mind to stretch comparisons, both actors were loved in their respective countries (although Howard, of course, was not English by birth). The French, of course, had a rich seam to mine in the shape of the Resistance which remains a sore point even now, more than half a century later and philosophers can spend hours debating which would be better, no Occupation means the French are spared untold suffering but movie-buffs lose out on classics like Armee de l'ombres. It's a braver man than I who would choose. Meanwhile here we have Rene Clement who would practically build an entire career out of World War Two with special regard to the Resistance. He burst on the scene as it were with Bataille du rail, a semi-documentary and followed with this screenplay by Noel-Noel himself who, the year previously, had enjoyed a personal triumph with La Cage aux rossignols, memorably re-made half a century later as Les Choristes. He takes the role well and the supporting cast, all totally unknown in England, complement him well. As a non-French person with no direct experience of the Occupation it is not for me to comment on anything other than the technical - writing, directing, acting - credits and, as I have intimated, I found them all up to snuff.

Made very shortly after the end of the war, this film, like Clément's "La bataille du rail", is in part a propaganda exercise. The French people, still dealing with the denunciation and punishment of collaborators, needed an image of themselves under the Occupation as united, defiant and courageous. It was also necessary to depict the Resistance as a spontaneous movement of ordinary people, in order to remove any divisive taint of politics (notably communism) that had been associated with it.Comic actor Noël-Noël, who also wrote the screenplay, plays the elderly and apparently innocuous Édouard Martin, an insurance agent with a passion for orchids. The secret he conceals, even from his family, is that he is the head of the regional Resistance cell. While liaising with London and co-ordinating the sabotage of German military depots in the area, he must also deal with a spy in his ranks.Much of the pleasure of this film is the double game that Martin must constantly play to divert suspicion. When his wife interrupts a meeting with two of his Resistance agents as they are discussing the fate of the German spy, he is forced to resort to coded language. "I have decided," he says, "not to renew his life insurance." There are also moments of genuine tension, as when a group of officers arrive to inspect his orchid house. Are they really interested in the flowers, as they claim, or do they suspect that this is where he hides his weapons and documents?Later films, such as Louis Malle's "Lacombe Lucien", would help to provide a more balanced picture of life under the Occupation. But this entertaining film stands as a tribute to the quiet heroism of ordinary people like M. Martin.

In my opinion the worst movie about a sad era. A propaganda movie for French social and national peace after the second world war. But this is not the truth, I'm French, and I want to the see the true history, like the German people. Sadly enough not all French people were partisans only few of them, and happily not all German people were Nazis. Noel Noel as a scriptwriter and actor is not unbiased. Unfortunately there is a good director (Lust for Evil, Forbidden games...). To me this movie is rubbish. About this era, I would advise people to watch the Louis Malle's movie : Lacombe Lucien, which is much more in keeping with historical truth, sadly French people are only humans.