UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Horror >

Urban Legends: Bloody Mary

Urban Legends: Bloody Mary (2005)

July. 19,2005
|
4.2
|
R
| Horror Thriller

On a prom-night dare, a trio of high school friends chant an incantation, unleashing an evil spirit from the past with deadly consequences.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Plantiana
2005/07/19

Yawn. Poorly Filmed Snooze Fest.

More
Allison Davies
2005/07/20

The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

More
Mathilde the Guild
2005/07/21

Although I seem to have had higher expectations than I thought, the movie is super entertaining.

More
Dana
2005/07/22

An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

More
SnoopyStyle
2005/07/23

Samantha Owens (Kate Mara) have her two girlfriends for a sleepover. They are interrupted by Sam's brother David. They are all outcasts after Sam published a school news story denouncing the football players. The girls recount a story about the murder of Mary Banner in 1969. She and two other girls were drugged by the football players. Sam also talk about the urban legend of Bloody Mary. Next day, the girls are gone and David accuses the football players of foul play. Sam and her friends reappear later that afternoon disheveled and suffering from the after-effects of a drugging. Soon, the jocks and the captain's girlfriend Heather Thompson are showing up dead in unusual circumstances. Sam and David track down one of the girls from the 1969 incident, Grace Taylor.The biggest name here is Kate Mara. It's odd that Sam's two friends aren't actually main characters. It doesn't help that they are limited actors. David isn't much better but at least, he's functional. Quite frankly, his role is unnecessary and Kate Mara should have been the only protagonist. The story should follow Sam and her two friends from the drugging onwards. The only good kill is the spiders and the CGI is cheap anyways. It's still creepy good. The other kills are either boring or silly or both. There are other issues and this never had a chance to be better than a B-horror.

More
FlashCallahan
2005/07/24

Samantha Owens is the editor of the high school newspaper and was blacklisted with her two friends, Gina and Mindy, by the football players after an article about them, so they do not go to a high school party.Samantha tells to the other girls an urban legend told by her mother: in 1969, in Salt Lake City, the two girlfriends of Mary Banner are drugged by their dates in a prom, but she understands the situation and runs from her date, who kills her and hide her body in a trunk in the basement of the school.Along the night, the three girls are drugged and kidnapped in a prank of the players, but Samantha has visions and premonitions about Mary.When her school mates are killed, Mary visits Grace Taylor, one of the girls abused in 1969, and finds that the victims are the descendants of the trio that killed Mary......Had very low expectations after the disaster that was the second movie. But sometimes, these direct to DVD sequels have a knack of being pretty good and making you wish there were more instalments.There is nothing original about the film, and the makers even steal deaths from other movies (the sun-bed scene is straight from FD3), and the hotel scene and Mary are reminiscent of The Ring and Samara.But one cannot help to enjoy the film. Who cannot enjoy three girls having a pillow fight, mocking each other, and then being abducted, it makes no sense to the narrative, but, the film works.There is a twist at the end, but it's nothing special, and adds nothing to the film.Aside from that, it's a throwaway movie which does it's job

More
ian163-1
2005/07/25

FANTASTIC MOVIE! Lillith fields rules! if any one know how to find her write me [email protected] I'm going to be crazy(( i want to speak with her/ help me.Send me photos,info,email(if you have)and all the movies she played. I'm searching for her for a months! Can you believe, I'm from Russia! i shouldn't watched this movie. but its to late, i saw it. And i failed in love with this actress, and now i don't no what to do. Ohhh if i knew her email or home number! it should be fantastic, but i believe in it.the one who searches will aways fond what he WATS. What can i say about the movie. It;s excellent, The 1 and the 2 part were not so good. The 3 is leading! So, thanks for your attention, i hope someone will help me. i will be query pleased. P.s. sorry for my pure grammar. I'm studying English for the 1st year, so you can see the result.By

More
Sam_Movie_Buff
2005/07/26

God. I don't know where to begin with this one. "Urban Legends: Bloody Mary" has to be one of the worst horror movies I have ever seen. Definitely a top 10 contender. Here we have the third instalment of the Urban Legend franchise, this time changing it up (yeah, such a smart idea). Instead of the UL usual stalk and slash story's, this time they're brining a supernatural aspect. To be more specific, Bloody Mary. Thrilled? I think not. When the movie ended, I was kind of lost for words. I was a big fan of the original. With it's smart script, great setting, talented cast and more than enough scares, it was an instant classic. The second addition "Urban Legend: Final Cut" was nowhere near up to the standards of the first, but it was entertaining enough and a decent sequel. This however is catastrophic. This was only made for the sake of having a trilogy.The movie has so many flaws and plot holes, it's just too hard to name them all. I would also suffer a severe head pain actually trying to go through the movie again - it sounds terrifying just thinking about it - but for all the wrong reasons. If I had to pick one thing that stood out the worst, it would have to be the story. Bloody Mary?, come on, give me a break. Seriously. The third Urban Legend should have been a slasher, fright fest. Going back to the true, original style of the first. Though, I know it would have never measured up to it's first, I would have probably respected it a lot more. The story is just lazy. It lacks any real spark. It's like they read one of the most boring takes on the several Bloody Mary stories, and turned it into a film.The second flaw would have to be, yep, you guessed it, the terrific acting. Man was it bad. Every single "actor" was bad. When I say everyone - I mean everyone! Not one of these Z listers has a decent shred of good acting abilities in them. This made the film appear cheap and unprofessional. All I wanna know is, who did the horrific casting job? They should be fired! All in all this film was more than below average. More so in fact that it doesn't even deserve 1 star. It's a terrible piece of film and should be avoided at all costs!

More