Macbeth (2006)

Such a frustrating disappointment

Powerful

If you don't like this, we can't be friends.

A Brilliant Conflict

I like to fill those cool mugs erected too bad it wasn't a sequel, pretty good actor I didn't know he was your summer stuff he's pretty keep acting Sam.

This is a great horror story. This was written by William Shakespeare so the story line is great. The acting in this movie is great. The special effects in this movie are great. 4.8 is underrating this movie. I give this 10 out of 10. This one of the best horror movies all time. Macbeth (1948) is better. Thorn of blood which a is a Japan version of Macbeth. Macbeth (1971) is also better. Macbeth (2015) is also better. This is a lot better then Macbeth (1979). This is great film. It is very scary. Sam Worthingtion is a great actor. Victoria Hill is a great actress. Lachy Hulme is a great actor. Geoffrey Wright is a great director. This is a film you need to see.

Great show for those who enjoy the Gang/Drug Lord/ shoot it out Genre. This portrayal of Will's dark Play will appeal to a younger audience and hopefully create interest in the classics again. Sombre, grisly and morbid just the way it was supposed to be. If you are squeamish Do Not watch. Too many head shots to count. Watch for the Trojan Horse. Another wonderful bow to the classics. Big ups to the Australian Film community for a walk on the wild side. Risking bringing Macbeth to the Twenty First Century. Always been a fan of Australian/ Maori/ New Zealand Productions since I read and watched Once Were Warriors , many years ago. You may also enjoy the version of Hamlet starring David Tennant and Patrick Stewart. Directed by Gregory Doran. Here we have a barefoot, jean and t shirt clad Hamlet bewailing his lot. Great made for TV movie.

Bored isn't what I was expecting to be while watching this film. I love Macbeth. I've both read the play and have been in a production of it. It's a beautiful play with some of Shakepeare's finest soliloquies. I can sit through a production of Macbeth and still appreciate the language, this adaptation from Geoffrey Wright even butchers the language of the play. What we have is a relatively slim adaptation of Macbeth with much of its substance left out and grim scenes added in.I didn't expect a film adaptation to include everything. Wright however has taken the original text and edited it with a meat cleaver. So many scenes are barely there. The characters of Ross and Lennox are almost non existent and the Witches are mere props rather than characters. Wright takes the lines of the play and adds his own little changes to them. Well, he didn't realize that once he has done this that it ceases to be Shakespeare. I don't think any character in the film speaks in iambic pentameters for any length of time. What we get is an awkward transition from some lines lifted directly from the play and Wright's creations which include big words. Shakespeare isn't about big words it's about the language. The music of the play is completely gone in this Macbeth and it is painfully noticeable.What really got me though is Wright's inclusion of two scenes that Shakespeare wisely put off stage. We aren't supposed to see Macbeth murder Duncan or see Macbeth look over Lady Macbeth's corpse. Shakespeare could be violent,grimly violent, but these scenes are more effective in building the character of Macbeth if we don't see them. Implied violence is so much more effective than seeing the dagger pierce the skin. Shakespeare could have easily have written a scene where Macbeth murders Duncan, he doesn't and it's brilliant. We only see Macbeth drenched in blood obviously already regretting his sins and haunted by the world's eyes. Not only do we see Macbeth kill Duncan in this version but it is a grim scene. Macbeth stabs Duncan multiple times with a vicious fury. Does Macbeth want to be there? The scene doesn't let us see the turmoil in Macbeth's head. He was a good man turned evil by his ambition. That mental transition is the key to Macbeth and we simply don't get the full effect if we see Macbeth kill Duncan.Macbeth looking over his wife's corpse is detrimental to their relationship in the play. I've read Macbeth many times and I can't answer this question, "Do Macbeth and Lady Macbeth love each other?" I tend to think that maybe they don't but I come to a different conclusion every time. Lady Macbeth is obviously flirting with Duncan during their brief interaction together. Their relationship is complex. All Macbeth says when he hears of Lady Macbeth's death is "She should have died hereafter, there would have been time for such a word." The best soliloquy of the play is delivered immediately after but I think Macbeth's "tomorrow" speech is largely about himself. There isn't time for such a word and it seems almost detrimental to the pacing of the final act to see Macbeth lament over his wife. By this time in the story Macbeth has lost his sanity, love is one of the last things on his mind. Maybe he loved her once but by that moment of the play he is incapable of love.The mob setting is really the only new thing about this adaptation and I think it is kind of clever in terms of staging. In terms of storytelling though it hurts Macbeth. Macbeth is about a mans fall from good to evil, does this work in a gangland setting? Macbeth and Duncan are supposed to be moral men at the beginning. You lose that seeing them as criminals. Is it really so far fetched to expect a gang member to kill to advance himself? It really isn't all that shocking. The thought of a kinsman killing a king he loved to advance himself has much more dramatic tension. While I admit there are some cool staging, the gangland setting isn't original enough to cut down the actual Shakespeare for overlong gun battles.