Scream at the Devil (2015)

Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

Not sure how, but this is easily one of the best movies all summer. Multiple levels of funny, never takes itself seriously, super colorful, and creative.

The acting is good, and the firecracker script has some excellent ideas.

It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

It's easily the worst movie I've ever seen in my life. It doesn't make any sense, it's poorly executed, the plot is not clear at all, and some scenes are extremely awkward, both because of the dreadful acting and because of how silly the dialogue is.The plot felt uncoordinated, some shots are way out of place (i.e. unnecessary slow motions), the scene where this diabolical fly chases her, the music felt out of place sometimes, some of the effects were really cheap and/or crappy. I'd love to find something redeeming about it, but I just can't. It's not worth the time unless you want to know how a really bad movie looks like.I'd choose The Room over this one any day.

If you have a brain and are over 25, this film will appeal to you. "A beautiful schizophrenic woman is pushed over the edge by her husband's illicit affairs" is indeed the perfect description of this terror film. Shari Shattuck is brilliant as Miriam. One cannot help but to fall in love with her electifying performance.Filmed in Venice, Joseph P. Stachura has taken the beauty of that City and made it really creepy.As Miriam returns to the States, things really go wrong and that's where one really has to have a certain level of intelligence to "get it". I won't spoil it for you but SEE THIS FILM!!

Well it wasn't all terrible. There were some creepy scenes to be honest, but the over all plot had a lot to be desired. The main character was interesting, but wasn't done well. I'm not sure if it was the writing or acting or both. Either Shari Shattuck over acted, a lot, or the writing was bad and her reactions were often too much for the scene. They never really developed characters much in the movie either. Not that you have to have that, but here it would have been helpful. It was obvious you aren't supposed to like the husband, and they elude to some affair, but never expound upon it at all. He acts like a jerk a few times to make sure you don't like him, but that's pretty much it.The main character plays crazy well enough, but I don't know, it just lacked something. Oh and Candyman makes an appearance to show people how acting works.

I tend to only review movies that were so bad I feel I must warn others not to bother with them.This is a good example of that. The acting is terrible, the story goes nowhere and no one seems to know what's going on. It was like a student film, and a bad one at that.I thought the premise sounded good, so I watched it, but this movie just inundates you with one scare after another until you grow immune and after a while the "scary" parts become comical.And these characters that show up at her door demanding to be invited in. How stupid is that? That's like the old vampire lore even though they aren't vampires. And those stupid "country" girls who can't even talk right. Why are the stereotypes always the same in junk like this? Don't these writers ever do any research?The best part of the movie was the scenery from Venice. I guess the crew and director did the whole thing just to get a free trip to Italy, because it had nothing to do with the rest of the story.Well, enough time wasted on this dog. There are plenty of really bad horror movies out there, but this one is so lame it makes you laugh and cry at the same time.