Night of the Wild (2015)

Pretty Good

Fresh and Exciting

While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.

It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

I wish to give less than 0 stars, for bad directing and actors playing. This is the most worst movie I have seen!Even a kid of 10 years old has more imaginations to create better stories to create a good movie than this one.I admit I have watched till the end only for the curiosity how the movies end, but I saw even the end is really a sh33t like this "movie"! And I wonder, Directors and all staff of this movie, when you saw this movie for the first time, how many of you accepted to publish it? Because it's a REAL bush33t of movie! Do you know it?Cheers.

This is one of the worst movies I have ever wasted 2 hours on. It has little to no plot and none of it is original. Something happens and dogs begin attacking and eating people. Bleh! The characters in addition to being 2 dimensional make every wrong choice they could possibly make. Usually the point in disaster movies is to survive whatever has happened. Not this one. The characters do everything possible to get attacked by the dogs except perhaps hanging raw steaks around their necks.I've seen some bad movies in my time; Mysterious Planet were you can actually hear the guy in charge (I will not use the term Director) yelling directions to the cast and Plan 9 From Outer Space which I still don't understand and this one ranks right up (or down) with them.

1st of all let me say that anyone who did rate the movie higher than a 1 is a complete idiot.In my opinion if it were possible to rate a movie plot lower than a 1 this 1 would have received a decimal point followed by Googolplex zeros.It should be a crime punishable by death to write scripts as bad as the movie Screen Writers for SyFy any/all Screen Writers that compose such garbage should forfeit their lives.Everything to define what cinemagraphic garbage this movie is has already been stated.

By Asylum's standards, this movie is a triumph. Since almost all Asylum films feature terrible CGI and brazenly atrocious acting, this film sets itself somewhat apart as it is a bit higher quality.I didn't say it was good. Just better than the average Asylum feature. Asylum movies are characterized by a formulaic construction using an outlandish plot, poor acting, egregious errors in common sense, and insultingly horrific computer animation.So what did "Night of the Wild" bring us? Outlandish plot. Check. We got it here. A meteorite crashes, causing all the canines from every quaint little hamlet in the county to converge upon one little town and maul every happy citizen with a sleeve. Great, I love it. It's nice to see that the townsfolk won't let a few glowing rocks from the heavens stop them from going about their town-ish business.Then comes the acting. Absolutely sub par, but not to the point of being distracting from the movie's action. I'm traditionally very easy on the actors of such films since I don't think anyone can really save a bad movie movie by eloquently delivering poorly written dialogue. What it comes down to is staying in character, and the actors managed it well enough. I'm sure others here will be happy to rip the acting apart, but frankly I don't see much to comment on here one way or the other.Next, we get some absolutely ridiculous distortions of common sense. I mean of course that the characters, when faced with disaster, seem to choose the most obviously insipid course of action available to them, every time, without fail. For many viewers of this genre, herein lies our blessed entertainment.Lastly, the aforementioned terrible CGI. I'm happy to report that for most of the movie, this element is lacking almost entirely. It seems that when faced with a plot line that does not involve mutated fusions of various reptiles and sea creatures, hideously gooey and slimy otherworldly visitors, spectacularly impossible or improbable natural catastrophes and/or large robots, the Asylum studio has enough presence of mind to actually reject hastily constructed and unconvincing computer animation.Or so I had hoped.. Unfortunately by the end of the film it became apparent that the budget was running short and they had to finish the movie in a hurry, so they filmed the car ride and the plane ride in a studio (you never get to see the vehicles moving), recycled and misplaced a scene or two (the blood and makeup mysteriously vanished for about 8 seconds), and then finally surrendered to the urge to do what they do best: add some hastily constructed and unconvincing computer animation. A patchwork finish if I've ever seen one.(Spoiler, the ending credits are apparently ashamed of themselves because they zip up at a truly confounding speed. I knew I should have taken that speed-reading course in college.) Altogether the movie was still entertaining, and in my humble opinion a good move in the right direction for the Asylum studio. It earns one of my higher Asylum movie scores.More please.