The MacKintosh Man (1973)

Simply Perfect

Nice effects though.

Don't listen to the Hype. It's awful

It is an exhilarating, distressing, funny and profound film, with one of the more memorable film scores in years,

Mostly, I just didn't care. With both Paul Newman and James Mason, this should have been an interesting and entertaining movie. Yet, somehow, it just never clicks. I knew not to expect a short-term up or chase scenes, but u did expect at least some character development.

Paul Newman was a wonderful actor....one of the best. But "Mackintosh Man" proves that not every part was perfect for the actor, as he was inexplicably cast as a British secret agent who pretended to be an Aussie. Most of the time, he just sounded like an American...and a British actor would have been much better in the lead because of this. Despite this, it is still an interesting film.Agent Rearden (Newman) is asked to do a strange mission...to get himself imprisoned on a serious theft and assault charge in order to infiltrate a secret organization that busts important prisoners out if the price is right. The plan works very well and Rearden is spirited out of prison (after being there over a year)...but when his boss is killed, things began to unravel badly.Aside from the casting of Newman, the ending was poor...and Rearden's actions made very little sense (especially because he'd already invested so much of his life on this case and knowing his boss was murdered). Try to ignore all this...as the rest of the film is well made and well worth seeing.

James Reardon is a member of British Intelligence that is called by his boss MacKintosh, to infiltrate a spy organization. To do so, he puts on an Australian accent and robs a postman. He is convicted and sent to jail. There he is approached by a man who offers to help him escape, claiming to be part of an organization. He is helped, but at the same time he is distrusted. Back in London, MacKintosh is trying to tie a prominent London politician into the Soviet(?) scandal. However, MacKintosh gets too close and is assassinated. Reardon too is in danger. MacKintosh's secretary and daughter (once again?) flies up to Ireland and together they track Soviet spies, but their own lives are at risk. Can they make it?This is the film's tag line: "Only MacKintosh can save them now. And MacKintosh is dead!". Wow...when I first heard that tag line I doubled over laughing. Which is precisely one more laugh than I got from this film. There are so many things wrong without this film, I could make a list....hey I've got enough time! Paul Newman plays a British man playing an Australian, sounding like an American. It is hard to understand what Dominique Sanda is saying, and her line delivery can be awful (ex."No, he was my father".). MacKintosh is in the title, and he is in the film for...five minutes. The plot is deliberately confusing. I had no idea what was going on until I looked it up later. Even then, it made no sense. James Mason's villain is paper thin, and the whole Soviet subplot is just a mess.However, the whole thing manages to break even. It is not the worst film Huston made (ahem, I'm looking at you Phobia), but it is far from his best. The whole cast seems incredibly bored, but no one is more bored than Paul Newman. This may very well be the worst performance I have ever seen Newman give. His rendition is so blank and oh so very boring, that at points you want to scream at him to show some of that famous Newman charm. Perhaps he was all charmed out, he made The Sting the same year. Still, he is one of the most dull and lifeless protagonists I've seen in a long time.However he does not give the worst performance of the film. That honor goes to Dominique Sanda. I loved her in Il Conformista, but her performance her has me doubting my initial affection. She too manages to be effortlessly wooden, but with a French accent! Harry Andrews, who plays MacKintosh is charming, but he gives no idea why anyone would have a whole plot revolve around him. Perhaps the one saving grace here is James Mason, he is good. My god, how I longed for some kind of charm! His character is poorly written, yet he manages to be...average!The script is entirely pointless. It makes no sense, and is unnecessarily confusing. It is fulled with pointless exchanges, and scenes were literally nothing important happens. There is a five minute sequence were Sanda and Newman talk, while they tan. That's it. But perhaps the greatest example of shoddy scripting occurs during the climax. Ahem, **SPOILER ALERT**. Sanda has been kidnapped, and Newman must save her from Mason's evil claws, because....he has to save her. So he goes onto a boat and knocks a sailor on the head, and demands to be taken to her, and then...he is. No chase sequence or exchange of dialog, that's..it. Then the sailor takes him to Sanda, and he talks to James Mason for a while, about...nothing. I'm pretty sure they bring up chess at one point. **END SPOILERS**Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't thrillers supposed to...thrill? If they are, than this is most certainly not a thriller. It may seem as if I am bashing the film relentlessly (I am), but the film is not without it's good points. It has some beautiful cinematography. The chase(?) scene through the foggy Irish lowlands is beautiful, even if it is more landscape than cinematography. The score by Maurice Jarre is also very good. It is cheerful and fun, something that Huston should have payed more attention to during the making of the film.Speaking of Huston, he directed this? After all it contains no directorial input, it could have shot itself. It is so boring and uninterestingly shot, it seemed like Huston just gave directing and let the story play itself out. Bad move. It's plot isn't very remarkable, but it could have been at least a little bit thrilling. Huston said himself that he hated the film, and it isn't hard to see why. It is a tepid, middling entry in Huston's filmography, and one I hope to never revisit again.The MacKintosh Man, 1973, Starring: Paul Newman, Dominique Sanda and James Mason, Directed by John Huston, 6/10 (C-) (This is part of an ongoing project to watch and review every John Huston movie. You can read this and other reviews at http://everyjohnhustonmovie.blogspot.ca/)

Desmond Bagley's tightly plotted thriller about a man who escapes from prison with the help of a gang and then finds himself on their wrong side is loosely adapted here and not very well. The idea is a clever one and makes for an excellent suspense thriller in print; in any good thriller, the character is cut off from aid and isolated in the middle of a dangerous situation, and making the central character a fugitive in the company of thugs who mistrust him does this very well. Unfortunately, much of the tension-filled atmosphere of the book is lost here as the story becomes a murky riddle built around a not-very-interesting main character. Newman effectively conveys that he is clearly more than he seems, but the movie has trouble turning that into viewer interest. The grim drizzly look of the movie is its best feature, but even that seems coincidental and not organically connected to the storytelling. There were worse movies made that year, but better ones too.