UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Drama >

In Country

In Country (1989)

September. 15,1989
|
5.9
|
R
| Drama

Samantha Hughes, a teenaged Kentucky girl, never knew her father, who died in Vietnam before her birth. Samantha lives with her uncle Emmett, who also served in Vietnam. Emmett hangs around with Tom, Earl, and Pete, three other Vietnam vets who, like Emmett, all have problems of one kind or another that relate to their war experiences. Samantha becomes obsessed with finding out about her father.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

GamerTab
1989/09/15

That was an excellent one.

More
Pluskylang
1989/09/16

Great Film overall

More
Murphy Howard
1989/09/17

I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.

More
Justina
1989/09/18

The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

More
Tom
1989/09/19

We almost didn't watch this movie, based on the IMDb ratings, but something told us to have a look anyway. What an excellent movie, and the best acting I ever saw Bruce Willis do before. If you have watched this move and haven't rated it yet, please do to help others know how good this is. This is a touching movie from the perspective of the daughter of a Vietnam soldier killed in the line of duty. The use of flashbacks was done well in this movie, as some movies make flashbacks too often and in unrelated order. The relationships among the characters were believable. This is a movie worth watching. Although it's a bit old, it didn't matter. This movie is timeless and could easily be related to the soldiers and their loved ones of any war.

More
brown_blonde
1989/09/20

I did not grow up in the Vietnam era, and instead, my education on the subject has been limited to the last week of history class when the teacher would throw in a couple of words about Vietnam, usually being content to proclaim that the war was an ugly loss that we should all just forget.I think that is a serious threat these days--people forget, and others like in my generation just don't have a clue, as to what went through these soldiers. This film does a fine job of relaying that. We feel the pain of Emmett who has had to suppress his feelings about Vietnam. We see how the wounds of war are not only skin deep and battlefield-limited: they are the scars that are carried within.Equally refreshing is the point-of-view of the unsung hero, the survivors. In this case the we see the war's impact on Sam, whose father died before she was born. 18 years after his death, in present day (1989), the audience is allowed to see the remaining impressions that a war leaves, and the difficulty of finding closure in a war that everyone wanted to forget.This is a film that ought to be seen because it depicts war from so many new points of view and in a way that is relatable to those of us who will never be able to comprehend the actual battlefield. See it, you won't regret it.

More
johnng45
1989/09/21

I like this movie very much. It's a real good movie ! Every part of the film is so real.The war seems nobody wants to remember.The movie's of a family face to cure the wounds of Vietnam. It catches the thrill of war and the disillusionment of soldiers. It'd be a good present for the Vietnam soldiers !The movie cures some retired American soldiers and their family. We have Bruce Willis , Emily Lloyd & Joan Allen on the movie, and this is another good Bruce Willis movie I ever seen before. He acts successfully to be a reclusive vet! If you don't claim for traditional Hollywood movies, this movie would suit u to watch. God bless the American soldiers !

More
A Box
1989/09/22

I liked two main things about the movie adaptation of In Country. One was Bruce Willis' performance. I'd read a bit about it beforehand, but I was quite impressed with the way he held his pain just under the surface for most of the film. We could almost see the wall he had put up for himself (and against himself). His meeting with Sam in the swamp fascinated me. I'm really interested in the gradual changes that occur in people, and in the swamp his wall finally breaks a bit and he lets Sam in. It's a very powerful scene by an underrated actor. I believe he won a Golden Globe nomination for this film, for what that's worth.The other thing I really liked was the final sequence at the Vietnam Memorial. The director and screenwriter realized that they didn't need to spoil it with a lot of philosophical junk about the tragedy of war. They show us using the darkness and slow decent of the wall, the people's reactions, and the characters' reactions. As much as I disliked Sam, I nearly got teary when she climbed up the ladder and kissed her daddy's name. Emmitt's scene where he leaves his awards there with his friends is another great one-hardly any (possibly no) words, simply the act of giving part of his past to his friends who didn't make it back.I noticed several changes in the movie, and the discussion afterwards showed me more. The most obvious was the structure; the movie is a straight, linear story while the book is a framed story. I don't think the frame wouldn't have worked too well as a film because I don't think most audiences want the bulk of a movie to be a flashback/look back type portrayal. I guess it seems too slow. One of the ones that bothered me the most was the change in Tom's character. In the book Tom has some kind of impotence or relationship problem because of the war. This prevents him from following his lust and taking Sam to bed. In the movie, it is implied that they do sleep together, and that Tom ends the relationship because he feels guilty or because of her age, not because of impotence or relationship issues. Many aspects of the book and storyline are understandably simplified to save time. Thankfully the Agent Orange obsession that Sam has in the book is largely absent in the movie. For example, Sam's two sets of grandparents are combined into her father's parents. She also spends less time with Dawn, and she goes directly from her grandparents' house to the swamp to read Dwayne's diary. We also don't see as much that she's out there to relate to the soldiers; instead she seems more like a little girl camping in her backyard.This brings me to my final point. Emily Lloyd's performance was annoying. Everything about her-her voice, her accent, her appearance, her actions, the way she ran (especially the way she ran-no trained runner would ever run like that during a race)-was annoying. Sure, part of it was simply because her character is like that. She begs and begs everyone to tell her about Vietnam, but when Emmitt finally does a bit she can't handle it, and she decides (briefly) that she doesn't like her father anymore because of what he did in the war. What did she expect? She just seems naïve and annoying, and that's not a fun combination. However, I must admit, she did make some progress, and at the end of the movie (when she leaves the photo of herself at Dwayne's grave) she has gained an idea of what war was like and the effects it has on veterans.If you like the movie, you might like the book even more. If you liked the book but haven't seen the movie, watch it simply to see Willis as Emmitt.

More