UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Drama >

Lola Montès

Lola Montès (1955)

December. 23,1955
|
7.2
| Drama History Romance

Lola Montes, previously a great adventuress, is reduced to being the attraction of a circus after having been the lover of various important men.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

SpuffyWeb
1955/12/23

Sadly Over-hyped

More
Pluskylang
1955/12/24

Great Film overall

More
FirstWitch
1955/12/25

A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.

More
Humaira Grant
1955/12/26

It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

More
JohnHowardReid
1955/12/27

A most interesting film, but Ophuls' masterpiece it is not. Often sweepingly directed in Ophuls' usual imaginatively rococo style and full to overflowing with rich pictorial splendors, certainly, but at times, incredibly, it is just plain dull. I've only seen the complete 140-minute version. It is possible that the re-edited versions are more lively, but I've no great desire to see them.Sad to say, one of my favorite stars, Martine Carol, does not come out of this chore with any great distinction. A wordy and poorly characterized script is partly to blame. It's also probable that director Ophuls spent so much time arranging the film's decor and its opulent visual effects, he had little to spare for Miss Carol — a natural beauty but not a natural actress. She's a lady that needs careful and sympathetic direction. Here, as in her other disasters such as "Action of the Tiger" (1957) and "The Stowaway" (1958), she was doubtless left largely to her own devices. Her costumes are a problem too. Colorful enough, but far too dressy. Hardly the sort of material to inspire her fans to commence cheering.The other actors are not much help either. Peter Ustinov's slow delivery hinders the pace as much as the careful mannerisms of Anton Walbrook. But at least Walbrook has presence, whereas Ustinov appears miscast. Ivan Desny seems too heavy, and by contrast, Oscar Werner too eager.Breathtaking photography with an often inspired use of CinemaScope, plus huge production values, can only marginally save what — sad to say — basically comes across as a rather empty, emotionally sterile production. (The 110-minutes CinemaScope version is currently available on a Fox Lorber DVD).

More
Hitchcoc
1955/12/28

If a film were purely spectacle and music, I would give this a 10. Unfortunately, the lack of charisma of the principle actress makes it hard to sit through. It is a series of vignettes offered to attendees of a circus where Miss Montes answers questions for a quarter and lets her hand be kissed for a dollar (the French exchange rate comes into play, of course). The movie is nice to look at with rich colors and interesting circus scenes. I wonder if the film has been worked on because it literally glows. It's the self importance of Carol and the tiresome people who seem to bring it down a bit. I never felt sympathy for her character; her arbitrariness just lost me. Franz Liszt looks like the second place winner in a Fabio look-alike contest. Then we are to feel great sorrow for her because she needs to stay in a dormitory for a short time on an ocean voyage. Because she feels slighted, she begins to get this crust about her and begin to use people. She is a courtesan in the true sense. Carol just doesn't work. Now Marlene Dietrich. There you go. Ophuls is interesting and this was his last film. It's certainly eye candy.

More
pushnlacs
1955/12/29

Lola Montes- Essentially the true story of a women who kept more lovers than is generally accepted as proper, the fact that she lived during the 19th century only made this an even bigger ordeal.Her dream was to be a dancer but this never really worked out and in the end her life story, due to people of the time being attracted to such scandal, is used as a circus attraction. It is through this circus performance and flash backs that we see her life story and what lead to her being a circus performer.Honestly when all was said and done I was much less bored with the film than I would have expected. The film goes by at a decent pace though nothing of much excitement happens.Ophuls direction is rather elegant. He creates some simple yet beautiful shots. Martine Carol in the role of Lola isn't what I'd usually call beautiful in a traditional sense but she does have a captivating quality to her.

More
FloatingOpera7
1955/12/30

With 1955's "Lola Montes" director Max Ophuls concluded his long career. He died shortly afterward. In many ways, this is his greatest film. The first film he used Technicolor was also his last. The cinematography, at its time, and in France especially, was new and innovative. By the mid 50's Technicolor was all the rage. However, only few directors could make a colorful film dramatic and not just fluff. Ophuls adapted the historic account of 19th century world famous courtesan Lola Montes to a fictionalized drama of her life. In the end of her life, Lola Montes is the feature attraction at a circus, headed by the money-hungry P.T. Barnum-like ringmaster played by the excellent actor Peter Ustinov. Through a series of panoramas and stunts her life is retold. The movie is mostly her flashbacks, though not necessarily in chronological order. She recalls how her mother sold her to a man she did not love. She ended that marriage and became a dancer/courtesan. A sex icon of her time, she drew many famous lovers. Among these was the mesmerizing pianist Franz Liszt, who rocked the world of classical music in the 19th century. Liszt abandons Lola who does not take long in taking up new lovers, each more powerful than the last. Her "ascent" - showcased by climbing ladders up to the suspended cage above the ring, represents her social climbing as a courtesan. At the height of her career, she was the mistress of the then politically troubled King Ludwig of Bavaria, the "Mad King", played successfully and effectively by Anton Walbrook.Lola is played by Martin Carol, a French model and actress who in real life died tragically. For this role, Carol did not accentuate the sensuality or free spirit of the eponymous heroine, who was known to be quite liberal, independent and highly sexual. This would be because it was the repressive 50's and sex was definitely not accepted on film or on television. Carol portrays Lola as a dignified woman, adding a touch of class and even pathos. She's even a victim of a male-dominated and cruel society. She's a quiet submissive object of beauty, as still as the Odelisk painting she poses for "en rose" or in the nude. The sad finale makes us feel very sorry for Lola. While we think she will die from that high jump to the center ring, especially because she has just re-lived her hard life through memories, and endured much public inspection by shameless spectators. However, she lives, but barely, as a sad, resigned woman who is possibly living her last days as the object of attention, though this time to her own detriment. Her glory days behind her, she's nothing but a sideshow now, where men pay for a kiss from her. My favorite scenes: Lola as a young girl on a cruise with her mother who is bent on marrying her off, Lola dancing at the Paris Opera Ballet, Lola and Liszt, Lola and her indiscreet affair with the married conductor of the Tivoli cabaret Claudio Pirotto. And of course the scenes with the King Ludwig. And that finale still gets to me.

More