Folks! (1992)

In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

It's an amazing and heartbreaking story.

A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.

Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.

I would really like to have seen how the people who made 'Folks!' managed to convince each other that this was a good idea. I looked for one of those 'Making Of' specials to hear the cast and crew try to explain themselves but suspiciously there wasn't one. How did they sit through screen writing sessions without somebody speaking up and questioning the morality of jokes about a man with Alzheimer's Disease? How did they convince Tom Selleck to play a role that requires his character to lose a toe, an ear, an eye and a testicle? How did they sit through the cast and crew screening without somebody speaking up about what a wretched idea this was? Maybe no one wanted to lose his or her job but it was no consequence to anyone that the studio would lose money.I'm a defender of the idea that nearly anything can be made funny with the tenderest of care, however Alzheimer's Disease is a subject that would probably need more caution then most. Ted Kotcheff directs 'Folks!' with wild abandon and that's his first mistake.Tom Selleck is woefully miscast as a New York stockbroker with a lovely wife and wonderful kids and a mother and father who are getting along in years. He goes to Florida when his mother needs surgery because she's worried about leaving Dad all alone. Dad (Don Ameche) has contracted Alzheimer's disease and wanders around like Mr. Magoo ambling around with a goofy smile and completely impervious to the chaos around him.Selleck belatedly figures out that there is something wrong and lets him drive the Cadillac which promptly gets backed into the lake. After that Dad burns down their trailer home naturally Selleck has to give them a place to live. This is an excuse for a long series of cruel jokes in which Dad gets son into one accident after another each more painful then the last.The most inexplicable scene comes when the parents offer to commit suicide by filling their car with gasoline so he can set them on fire so that he can collect the insurance money. That scene even in the hands of the best screenwriter would be impossible to make funny.There are three dozen different wrong decisions that went into the making of 'folks!' not the least of which is the miscasting of Tom Selleck. Selleck is such a down-to-earth actor, such nice guy on 'Magnum P.I.' and in films like 'Three Men and a Baby' and 'Quigley Down Under' that it makes me cringes to watch him playing a creep getting knocked around like a pinball. Ditto Don Ameche whom I've admired as a smart actor in his early films and in his later career in films like 'Cocoon'. I would really like to know how they talked him into playing this role.What on earth made anyone think that this was a good idea? I could probably argue that this might have worked as an extremely black comedy. Just to add another point, this movie was released just after the terrible accident in New York in which an elderly man was killed in a car accident so you can see that even the time for release was bad.

Twenty-two years before screenwriter Robert Klane wrote "Folks!", he wrote the screenplay for "Where's Poppa?", another movie that dealt with a grown man dealing with a senile parent. Since "Where's Poppa?" was successful at the box office and became a cult classic, maybe Klane thought the same basic idea would work again. Maybe it could have, but it didn't. While there are a small number of moments that will make you smirk a little, otherwise the movie is desperately unfunny. What made "Where's Poppa?" work was that *all* the characters were insane, so it was easy to laugh at their troubles. But in "Folks!", Tom Selleck is normal-minded, so when we get to see him abused in various ways, we feel sorry for him instead of laughing at his troubles. Also, a lot of the attempts at humor are quite mean-spirited and harsh, enough that even insane characters would have a tough time making them work. A critical and financial bomb, you'll wonder how this movie wrangled a DVD release years later.

Some people have no sense of humor. I laughed until I cried the first time I saw this movie. It is not reality, it is comedy. Real life situations that many of us may face as our loved ones age have been taken to the extreme, so we can laugh. The loss of a testicle is not funny but how it happened and being called one-nut is. I would call it a modern day screw-ball comedy along the lines of "Bringing Up Baby". It should be released on DVD shortly (I will be getting it) just sit back, suspend reality and enjoy--what's not to enjoy about watching Tom Selleck?! I also loved "Blind Date" with Bruce Willis and Kim Bassinger. I recommend this movie to anyone who loves to laugh.

This is a good movie. Sure, it won't win any awards, but it's still a lot funnier than many more successful films out now. Some people seem to have a problem with mixing humor and Alzheimers. My own grandfather had this horrid disease and eventually passed away a few years back. Does this make me feel that this movie is less funny? Not for a moment. The reason is that nothing bad ever happens to Dom Ameche's character. He sets up Tom Selleck time and time again for painful slapstick gags, but he always comes out squeaky clean. I found the writing witty with some good one-liners and great character interaction. On a believeability scale, it rates pretty low, but it is plausable. I saw no plot holes that others have mentioned, but it's easy to see plot holes when you already know the concept of the story, unlike the characters who are in the dark and haven't seen a "trailer" of their lives. The cast is also great, btw.All in all, this movie is a great distraction, but if you haven't smile or laughed in awhile and you think South Park is immature, you probably won't like this film. If you do see it, just remind yourself that they are not making fun of Alzheimers, they are poking fun at the misadventures one man has trying to take care of his aging parents while trying to retain his own sanity.