The Gun That Won the West (1955)

Truly Dreadful Film

That was an excellent one.

Good films always raise compelling questions, whether the format is fiction or documentary fact.

The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

The Gun That Won the West (1955) ** (out of 4)Director William Castle and producer Sam Katzman teamed up for this cheap Western that takes place after the Civil War as the government wants to build some forts but it is in Sioux territory so they recruit Jim Bridger (Dennis Morgan) to lead the project. It doesn't take long for the project to run into trouble with the Indians.THE GUN THAT WON THE WEST has an epic title but of course that's certainly not what was delivered. If you know anything about Castle or Katzman then you know they were masters at working on low-budgets and delivering cheap entertainment. That's not to say that their cheap movies weren't entertaining at times but there's no doubt that movies like this were meant to be rushed into theaters to make a quick buck.In all honesty, if you're a fan of these type of "B" Westerns then you should get some mild entertainment out of this. I think the most impressive thing for me was how many extras were on hand here. This was especially true for the Indian characters as their group was quite large during certain scenes and I was surprised because of the budget. The story itself is pretty typical and there's certainly nothing original going on.For the most part Morgan was mildly entertaining as was Richard Denning and Paula Raymond. There's certainly nothing great about the performances or the characters but, then again, we're watching a "B" movie. Castle keeps the film moving along well enough so fans of his will enjoy this.

After building the entire plot and several key scenes around the introduction of the breech-loading Springfield "trapdoor" rifle, this movie fails to show a single round fired from the new rifles in the climactic battle with the Indians. Instead, the cavalrymen charge with sabers and wrestle in hand-to-hand combat, much too close to get off any shots. This is inexplicable in light of the general accuracy of the firearm details in the film: the cap-and-ball revolvers and 1860ish muzzle loading percussion rifles are period correct, as are the unadorned gun belts and of course the Springfields. I was even impressed with the Indians' reasonably dignified dialog, which was notably free of the "me see um" and "ugh" variety. Maybe the misleading title should be changed to "The Gun That Won the West Right After This Movie Ends."

This movie, although shot in widescreen and color, is as cheap as a Bowery Boys adventure, features no appealing actors, typically racist characterizations of Native Americans, poorly staged fight scenes, and just about everything else that is poor and forgettable in the American Western. Surprise, surprise -- it was directed by the notorious William Castle, whose main talent was not direction but rather in-house cinema tricks like electrocuted seats and flying skeletons. For an example of how poorly the film is directed, take a look at the two big fight scenes with the film's lackluster leading man, Dennis Morgan -- in the first, he's ambushed by a single "indian" as he's out in the woods for no good reason with his best friend's wife (Paula Raymond who, incidentally, he earlier offered to "make love to"). The "indian" takes one poor shot at Morgan and Company, then we see Morgan apparently maneuver around a rock to take a crack shot at the "red skin" (yes, this film liberally uses that term), who we see die in a close-up. In other words, never were the two combatants actually on screen together, and never is there a single shot that situates them in such a way that there is any suspense and sense of physical location in the combat. In another example of Castle carelessness, during the big final confrontation, Morgan and a "red skin" are mud wrestling rather ineffectively while everybody else seems to be hacking and shooting each other. It's as if Morgan and his foe are in another movie. The action scenes in this film are done in such a way that there is no excitement and no drama whatsoever, just a cartoonish killing spree.It's a cheap, ugly film and it has nothing at all to offer a modern viewer. Richard Denning is the only actor who can hold any weight, and after his initial half-convincing drunk scenes, he becomes a boring self-sacrificing hero. The most exciting scene in the film is a hunt for wild buffalo. It's not worth taking time out of your life to see this.

1955 was a bang up year for Hollywood films featuring conflicts between European settlers or the US army and Native Americans led by Sioux Red Cloud in the Powder River region of Wyoming. Besides this film, "The Last Frontier" also dramatizes the conflict between this 'Indian' confederation and the US army, which built a series of forts along the Bozeman Trail through this region."The Tall Men", starring Clark Gable, dramatizes the first large cattle drive from Texas to Montana, passing through this region. All of these films include some historically-relevant aspects, along with major fabrications and/or anachronisms. In this era, 'Indians' were still nearly always scripted as the enemy: inconvenient obstacles to technological progress and the fulfillment of Manifest Destiny. Thus, none of these 3 films mentions the fact that Red Cloud's confederacy ultimately won a peace treaty in 1868 that stipulated that the US army would abandon its newly built forts along the Bozeman Trail and that this trail would be closed to European settler traffic. This treaty effectively lasted until 1876, when the discovery of gold in the Black Hills again brought European settlers in conflict with the Sioux and related tribes. The previous film "Tomahawk" provides a much more accurate account of this war.This story begins with alcoholic ex-frontiersman Jack Gaines(Richard Denning) and his beautiful wife(Paula Raymond) running a traveling wild west show through the eastern US. Storied mountain man and scout Jim Bridger is part of their show. Comes an army request that Bridger return to the West as a scout for Colonel Carrington and an influence with chief Red Cloud, in an endeavor to build a series of forts along the Bozeman Trail to protect workers building a railroad through this prime hunting grounds for the north plains 'Indians'. Bridger accepts, and Mrs. Gains convinces a reluctant Jack to accompany Bridger. To help accomplish this task, the army has commissioned the manufacture of a superior Springfield rifle. Unlike previous models, this one has a rapid breech-loading mechanism, and is accurate at long distances, thus making it a much more effective weapon against the 'Indians' than previous models.Once at Fort Laramie, Carrington's headquarters, Gains suggests they threaten Red Cloud with news of the new rifle. But Red Cloud says he will exterminate them before this rifle arrives. Later, Gains appeals to General Pope, who has replaced Carrington as commander at Ft. Laramie, after Carrington left for the Powder River region. Gains demonstrates the rifle to Red Cloud, who is impressed, but again says he will exterminate Carrington's forces before more of these rifles arrive. Wounded Gains rides to tell Carrington, and Bridger rides to tell Pope to direct his forces, with the new rifle, to attack Red Cloud before he attacks Carrington. A big battle ensues, the new rifle takes its toll, and the 'Indians' retreat. A now sober Gains is reunited with his estranged wife, and they talk about starting a ranch in this region.To me, the film appears to have been largely shot in the spectacular-looking Badlands region of SD, which includes the bison chases and kills. Apparently, some stock footage from "Buffalo Bill" was used for the Wild West show scenes. The real Jim Bridger would have laughed himself silly at Dennis Morgan as his stand in. The real Bridger was in his 60s during the Red Cloud War, and usually with long hair and bearded, not the '50s-looking, young, clean-shaven and shorn, bland,Morgan.Denning was OK as the fictional Jack Gaines. But, Wild West shows didn't begin until the '80s, whereas the rest of this story takes place 15-20 years earlier. Thus, this unnecessary aspect of the film should have been deleted. Roy Gordon was OK as the historically-correct Colonel Carrington, and Howard Wright was OK as ex-Civil War General Pope. The real Pope did spend some years involved in western 'Indian' wars, but apparently was not involved in this way. Paula Raymond made a beautiful and forceful Mrs. Gaines, but Robert Rice hardly makes a credible-looking Red Cloud. Young Man Afraid Of His Horses(probably a mistranslation) was a real lieutenant under Red Cloud during the Powder River War. However, Red Fox, later to gain fame in Buffalo Bill's traveling show, wasn't even born yet, and lived to see Nixon resign as President! Overall, the acting and dialogue is a bit wooden, and no major stars are included. This was the first year for Clover Productions, which mostly produced low budget fantasy films at this time, marketed by Columbia.The real Powder River War had nothing to do with railroad building, and everything to do with protecting settlers who were mostly heading for the recently discovered gold fields around Virginia City, MT. The 1866 model breech-loading Springfield was rushed to Carrington's forces, and did greatly improve the effectiveness of the army against the 'Indians', over the previous muzzle-loading version: the standard issue in the Civil War. However, ultimately the army brass decided to pull out of this area and concentrate its resources on protecting the transcontinental railroad, being built across southern Wyoming at this time. Incidentally, 'The Gun that Won the West' is usually considered to be the Winchester repeating rifles, also introduced in 1866, and the Colt revolvers, not this single shot army rifle.