UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Drama >

Dummy

Dummy (1979)

May. 27,1979
|
7.2
| Drama TV Movie

The real-life account of an illiterate, deaf-and-mute, black youth who was accused of murdering a prostitute, and the relationship that developed between him and his court-appointed attorney, who also was deaf, and the events leading up to his precedent-setting trial.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Evengyny
1979/05/27

Thanks for the memories!

More
CrawlerChunky
1979/05/28

In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

More
Megamind
1979/05/29

To all those who have watched it: I hope you enjoyed it as much as I do.

More
Fleur
1979/05/30

Actress is magnificent and exudes a hypnotic screen presence in this affecting drama.

More
thejcowboy22
1979/05/31

Your found by authorities with blood on your hands and accused of murder. Your apprehended and thrown in locked cell. You don't know what the commotion is about and to make matters worse your deaf and mute, you can't communicate with anyone. This is the tragic story of the life and troubled times of Donald Lang. A deaf loading dock worker from Chicago who frequented neighborhood bars and dens of iniquity with his earnings. One faithful night Donald walked off with a prostitute. Moments Later Donald was found by police in an alley over the dead prostitute's body. A deaf mute but not like most with his misfortune. Donald was born deaf and at the critical age of six was about to embark on a school for the deaf to learn how to sign, lip reading, read and write to communicate with the outside world.Due to untimely circumstances, Donald's parents split up and with financial burdens were unable to send the boy to the deaf school rendering him illiterate,irresponsible and over protective leaving him unprepared in life and in this case murder. Unable to stand trial because of an earlier supreme court decision that a defendant must understand the charges against him and have the ability to aid his attorney in his own defense, poor Donald lacked the skills to even form a simple sentence. Enter Deaf Attorney from the State of Illinois, Lowell Myers An extraordinary individual highly educated with numerous credentials. A Masters in Business Administration, B.A in accounting, C.P.A. and a Law Degree.Mr. Myers being a tax attorney and CPA was a ground breaking advocate for the hearing impaired in the State of Illinois. Getting legislation passed for the deaf in fraudulent business contracts and phony real estates deals manifesting into law that an interpreter be present when signing any contract involving a deaf person. Also Myers lobbied for the Deaf to obtain Drivers licence in the State of Illinois emphasizing that a deaf driver has a deeper concentration at the wheel and does not get distracted. With Donald Lang in Jail, Lowell Myers fought for his right for due process. It took a few years but a trial was finally held. This challenging made-for-TV movie gives us an unprecedented look at a person who can't fend for himself. LeVar Burton as the frustrated Lang, makes great use of pantomime throughout with his physical gestures borrowed from his role as the captured slave Kunta Kinte in the famous "Roots" series. Personally I feel that this was Paul Sorvino's finest role and I've seen quite a bit of his work. The concentration of his fractured speech emulates a deaf person's voice perfectly and consistently through out the movie. Brian Dennehy as Lang's boss does a fine job in a supporting role. I watched and most importantly learned about two separate individuals both branded with deafness. Guilty or innocent? I learned a great deal from this movie. Other movies like Amistad and Johnny Belinda also feature court scenes with persons who could not defend themselves due to hearing loss or language barriers.

More
crimefile
1979/06/01

I knew Donald Lang between the two killings. He was kind, bright, very strong and hard working. He had ape like qualities that Lavar Burton could not emulate, nor should he have tried.Lang was always being victimized by pimps, whores and scumbags wandering the ghetto. Lang had a sense of honor, justice and compassion that his tormentors did not have.I believe he was a lot smarter than most people thought and could understand volumes. He communicated with me by grunts and pointing. I could swear he could understand what I was saying to him.The only time anyone cared to teach him sign language and communication skills was to try him for murder. That never happened. I don't know where Lang is today but I know he's not in the Illinois prison system.He only needed a better understanding of how to deal with the evil people in the world. I really think that he felt that killing people who would rob him was okay. His world was truly a jungle and the laws of the jungle applied to him.Lowell Myers was a fine man. Sorvino did not look like him but captured all of his humanity in the film. Someday I'd like to talk to him about this film. I had a chat with Brian Dennehy who played Lang's boss earlier in his career. It's a great story and should be released on DVD someday. A jail guard from the Cook County jail named Cheserleigh played himself in the film. He too knew Lang

More
dtucker86
1979/06/02

I remember watching this film twice as a kid, I haven't seen it since. Ernest Tidyman wrote the screenplay for it (he is the same guy who wrote The French Connection). LeVar Burton made his debut as Kunta Kinte in Roots (what a great way to start your career). He said at the time that this was the most challenging role imaginable, playing a deaf and dumb young man accused of murder. Donald Lang is a 20 year old who lives with his siblings and works on the loading docks, he is charged with murdering a prostitue. Lowell Myers is a deaf lawyer who takes on his case. Paul Sorvino is an excellent actor who always delivers and he takes on this challenging role as well. This movie makes it out like there is evidence that Donald Lang was innocent and didn't kill the hooker Ernestine Myers. A woman tells his lawyer that she heard Myers having an argument in the alley where she was murdered with another man and she heard his voice! Lang is taken back to the alley where she was killed and "acts out" a scene where he fights with another man who was the real killer. Sorvino makes an excellent speech at the conclusion where he talks about how a deaf mute is still entitled to the same rights as everyone else. He points out how Charlie Chaplin could make an audience laugh and cry and not use one single word. Its a great speech that tugs at your heartstrings its true, but folks I need to point out something. Every time Hollywood makes a film about a real life murder case, they always make it out like the criminal in question was INNOCENT! Why in the hell do they do this? Is Hollywood full of bleeding heart liberals who pee their pants every time someone is accused of a crime and God forbid if they are poor or African American! Evil comes in all colors and Donald Lang was evil and he was GUILTY! Five years after the murder of Ernestine Myers he was released from the asylum. Shortly afterwards, there was another woman who was murdered and he was seen leaving a bar with her. This time, there was overwhelming physical evidence that Lang was the killer and he was sent to prison for the rest of his life. If our legal system worked the way it should, this woman needn't have died. Donald Lang really was a killer and no amount of moralizing by Hollywood can change that cold hard fact. This film sort of reminded me of The Hurricane about Rubin Carter. It is a well made film with fine actors, but at the same time you have to take it with a grain of salt folks because the murdering son of a bitch really did it! CASE CLOSED!!!!!

More
lizannprice
1979/06/03

i saw this film a very long time ago and its impact was tremendous. so much so that although i had long forgotten the title i had not forgotten the film. only since i have been on the internet have i been able to trace the name of the film and subsequently look out for it on british tv or sky. so far though i have not come across it again. this film is more than worthy of a reshowing and i, for one, would be very pleased to see it again. i would go as far as to say that this film has haunted me for all this time.

More