Dying God (2008)

People are voting emotionally.

everything you have heard about this movie is true.

A brilliant film that helped define a genre

One of the most extraordinary films you will see this year. Take that as you want.

It looks like it was shot on a cheap handycam with no lighting talent whatsoever. The monster looked terrible too. The music was good and dialogue clear but otherwise totally uninspiring. Horrible acting and horrible direction. Misty Mundae was a happy bonus. What happened to Lance Henriksen? Not in the slightest bit scary or even interesting.

Well my advice ..after seeing 15/20 minutes ...is : DON'T WASTE TIME ! this is not a B movie but for sure a C one...anyhow depends not of the personal "taste" but really it is just another bad one...a mixture of thriller my ass + soft porn + horror of bad imagination ....maybe LANCE H. is out of cash badly i will not yell loud i will just turn it off and hope GOD will punish them for such a bad movie so GOD is not DYING but will make you very happy if you will not lose HIS time with this s...t Well my advice ..after seeing 15/20 minutes ...is : DON'T WASTE TIME ! this is not a B movie but for sure a C one...anyhow depends not of the personal "taste" but really it is just another bad one...a mixture of thriller my ass + soft porn + horror of bad imagination ....maybe LANCE H. is out of cash badly i will not yell loud i will just turn it off and hope GOD will punish them for such a bad movie so GOD is not DYING but will make you very happy if you will not lose HIS time with this s...t

I think if I had come into this knowing it was basically a porn studio, with porn actors, and porno cinematography creating this film, I might have passed itup. I saw Henricksen and Moran in the cast and somehow I imagined that Misty Mundae must have made the leap to real movies after The Rage and her Masters of Horror episode.Nope. This movie features plenty of softcore scenes, nudity at every possible opportunity. They obviously had a lot of porn props and actors because there are stank hos dildos and cheesy bondage leather all over the place. To be honest I like porn and naked people but it doesn't add anything to the plot, and I've never liked porno that tries to have a plot, so they get a big fail from me. I think perhaps they thought all the sex would add to the "dark and decadent" aspect of the film but it just seems forced.The high point of the film is the wheel-chair mounted concealable harpoon gun, that was truly original. Also the titties were good. The monster suit looks like it was recycled from a late 90's sci-fi series, and although it apparently rapes its victims to death and has a giant penis in the one illustration we see, no such deadly phallus is ever seen on the monster. Obviously even monsters like to exaggerate the size of their member.Overall, Henriksen must have been hardup for cash because this is a new low even for him. Only see this if you are trapped in a porn store or something, cause that's probably going to be this film's primary outlet.

If you started off with the premise that you could make one of the worst films ever whilst talking to a group of ten year old school kids, and then wrote a script together with them that contained no original dialogue, a plot that was predictable in every way possible and then cast a bunch of incompetent actors (Even Henriksen is bad in this one!), mix it together with an absurd blend of clichés and some bare breasts, then this is what you would probably end up with.Some films are so bad that they're good fun. The trash aesthetic and all that, but this one is just trash. Rubbish. Truly and utterly awful.The only thing that kept me watching was the vague hope that it couldn't get any worse. But at least it didn't disappoint in that respect.The score was good. And there you have the one and only redeeming factor for this execrably bad, fetid piece of tripe.Cheers, Will