Witchcraft 666: The Devil's Mistress (1994)

Strong and Moving!

The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

One of the most extraordinary films you will see this year. Take that as you want.

By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.

So why 10 out of 10? Mainly to counteract the "Academy". The Academy believes that no film which does not deal directly with some left-wing (gay anything!) societal issue, have a completely depressing ending, or at the very least involve unattractive actors mumbling philosophical nonsense to each other in Swedish or French has any right to be seen. Not so! Klaus Kinski in Herzog's "Aguirre, the Wrath of God" is tedious enough to make me want to peel off my own flesh. Stephanie Swinney in "Witchcraft 6", on the other hand, leads me to believe that some flesh just needs to be appreciated. It should be remembered that in its beginnings cinema never aspired to the status of art. It was entertainment pure and simple. That some film has indeed achieved the status of art is both inarguable and laudable, but it would be unwise to denigrate that which aims to merely titillate or entertain.

This is good harmless fun. Although some typical, uptight,feminist reviewed this and complained about the "gratuitous" female nudity, I enjoyed it and so will most heterosexual men and bisexual women! This was made back in the '80's before the "politically correct" crowd stepped in. Back then you could find lots of fun films with ample female nudity. Nowadays, all we get are dicks flapping in our faces. (yuch!) Female frontal nudity is always a good thing. We need a lot more of THAT in mainstream films, instead of men's penises. Maybe one day things will be fair and Hollywood and the MPAA will allow full female genital nudity (the labia and clitoris) to be shown, the same way they allow full male genital nudity to be shown!Until then, its best to go back to the '80's flicks. Basically this is one of those low budget, campy, fun, not-to-be-taken-seriously horror films that promises good female nudity. I'll take it over disgusting, gay-porn garbage like "Bruno" any day! 8/10

This extremely cheap waste of time is more concerned with gratuitous female nudity than anything of interest in the so-called "plot." Two donut-eating, wisecracking cops enlist the aid of retired, now good warlock Will Spanner (Jerry Spicer) to help track down a Satanic serial killer. The evil leader is an old, dyed-blonde bar owner with a huge forehead who sends out a beautiful vixen (Shannon McLeod) and a muscular guy with a "nice butt" (Craig Stepp) to seduce, then sacrifice lots of silicone-enhanced blonde bimbos.If you think the acting, photography, dialogue and lighting are bad, just wait until you see the FX. Scenes of belly buttons turning into Satanic stars and a solar eclipse that eventually shoots laser beams (?!) are among the worst effects ever to hit the small screen. Spicer having sex in the bathtub with his wife (Debra Beatty) is the only memorable part.Do yourself a favor and forget this awful direct-to-video series even exists!Director Julie Davis also scripted, and shows none of the talent that made her indy romantic-comedy I LOVE YOU, DON'T TOUCH ME! (1997) so enjoyable.

Sex, sex, and more sex seems to be the plot of this late entry in the series. What plot there is, is about a a series of murders happening in the California hillside. Seems the murders are linked to the devil who is looking for his virginal bride.If you like sleaze, then you should more then enjoy this. No plot, bad acting, bad direction, bad special effects, bad editing, but lots of graphic sex and nudity. Enjoy!! Unrated; Extreme Sexual Content, Nudity, Profanity, and Mild Violence.