Skokie (1981)

Fresh and Exciting

At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

It's a movie as timely as it is provocative and amazingly, for much of its running time, it is weirdly funny.

George Dzundza who ironically would be playing many Jewish roles later on in his career plays an American Nazi Party leader who is looking for a little headline grabbing. What to do, but stage a march and stage it in a town that has a large Jewish population, Skokie, Illinois, suburb of Chicago.The film Skokie is an account of the famous incident that never was because in the end Dzundza and his mouth breathers decide after all they didn't want to march in that "Jew town" anyway. But the question of his right to march, to assemble was in fact a constitutional issue. And the American Civil Liberties Union took on as it did this most unpopular of causes. The man who did it was John Rubinstein playing an attorney of the Jewish faith.What the film does demonstrate is the reaction to this publicity stunt from various people. The mayor of Skokie Ed Flanders is righteously offended and also mindful of his large Jewish constituency. The city attorney Eli Wallach who happens to be Jewish as well is eager to try any legal means to keep them out, but he also realizes the free speech and freedom of assembly issues. He and Rubinstein are finely matched pair of adversaries. Police Chief Brian Dennehy just wants to make sure public order is maintained without bloodshed. There are several generations of Jews in the town and they're deeply read in their culture, the young ones. But for Danny Kaye and Kim Hunter this is up close and personal. They are survivors of the camps and well remember what they didn't do back in the day and how friends, family, and neighbors paid when the Holocaust came. No one carrying that symbol of hate is going to march in their town, the hell with the American Civil Liberties Union. Skokie as it records the famous controversy in 1977 is finely cast and well crafted and could have also been a big screen theatrical release film. I wish it was in fact. Everyone should see this film.This marked the final feature film appearance of Danny Kaye whose last two roles, Skokie and The Madwoman Of Chaillot showed a fine dramatic talent that more than hints came out in such films as Me And The Colonel and The Five Pennies. We should have seen more of it, but Kaye was way too good a clown to keep that talent under wraps.Skokie is a must see film, a great tribute to the town and the people who were united in never seeing these people soil their fair city.

Danny Kaye again showed his talents as a brilliant dramatic actor in this 1981 television movie.He plays a Holocaust survivor who has settled in Skokie, Illinois after the war. Skokie has become a predominantly Jewish town and the serenity of the area is threatened with the Nazi garbage threatening to march through the town to cause the reopening of nightmarish wounds, fear and trepidation among the Jewish citizenry of the town.As the spokesman, Kaye conveys those fears but is adamant that the garbage shall not march. His voice is etched with unbelievable feeling as he will do anything in his power to thwart the threatened march.As the Nazi leader leading such a march, George Dzundza is quite effective as Nazi Frank Collin. Filled with hatred, and contempt for humanity, Dzundza also etched an unforgettable character. Of course, the picture belongs to Kaye and he received an Emmy nomination for best actor for it.There is only so much that an afflicted people can take- 1st amendment rights or not.

To me, this was an excellent movie. This was one of my favorite movies of all time. Forget Schindler's list, to me this movie was a much better in certain aspects for emotion. One of the best scenes in this motion picture (one that in the 4 minutes it takes to play invokes more emotion from me as the viewer than all Schindler's list) is where Danny Kaye as Max Feldman answers his daughter's question about what happened to her grandparents. Max and his wife - holocaust survivors, have kept the horrors of the camps from their daughter. She has very little knowledge of what happened and at 13 or 14 she asks questions. Danny Kaye (Max) takes the time (against his wife's wishes) to finally tell his daughter. The strength and power of this single scene rests with the unemotional and matter of fact way that Max explains the nature of the death camp to his daughter. No emotion on the part of Max - - the character is breaking up inside yet is telling his daughter what the Nazis did to his parents in a manner to spare her the emotion. This while his wife is listening from around the corner quietly falling to pieces. You know the deep emotion that he has with the issues when he attends a meeting to discuss the question of Nazi's marching in Skokie with the vehemence and passion he holds on the issue. Yet he holds back this emotion with his daughter. Like I said, this few minutes of the movie is more powerful than the total Schindler's list - in my opinion. The full movie has its flaws, and covers the 1st amendment issues of American Nazi's right to march in detail, covering all sides of the issue. But this is a powerful movie and shows the depth of Danny Kaye's acting talents. A very surprising made for television movie about a very interesting topic. It is well done and very unlike Hollywood today.

If you are a lawyer or a judge that is interested in a documentary movie that talks about a case and what happened, this you will like Skokie. There really isn't any great acting in it, in fact a lot of the dialogue of Kaye is cheesy and overly dramaiszed. Most roles are one dimensional and overplayed, but the director did convey the message of the trial and the consequences that followed.If you need to do a report on the Skokie trial, and you want your research to be somewhat entertaining then this movie may serve you a very good purpose, other than that I wouldn't recommend it.