Open Cam (2005)

At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.

The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

Low budget gay films often have certain weeks -- usually plot and acting -- which this film certainly suffers from. The problem is that its reach far, far exceeds its grasp. It makes the nice effort at being a serial killer/thriller but this is essentially simply window dressing to disguise a very soft-core pornish excuse for nudity, which is surprising in this day of so much free naked male imagery and the ease at obtain steamed video hard and soft core male on male visuals on the web that any one would bankroll something like this. The serial killer plot is poorly thought out and filled of some blatant and gaping plot holes, as some other reviewers commented. There are enough crime procedurals on TV to know, for example, that it would never be that easy or quick to get a search warrant, that you would interview the obvious possible witnesses (neighbors, etc.) and that there is no way a body could simply sit in a man's apartment for a month -- this guy has no job and no one else in the building has a sense of smell? Can you just picture the cops from Law & Order moving into someone's apartment -- or that the person being "protected" would just be OK with it? Also, how does the killer get into all these apartments, particularly the john who paid $700. And how many hustlers in DC make $500, much less $700 for what appeared to be an hour long out-call that wasn't even originally going to include anal sex? Technically, the movie also suffered in a poor sound mix, some occasionally bad lighting, and the unevenness of the performances. While some were adequate to decent/good, others were just plain bad, although that may have been just as much of a reflection of the lack of character development and the poor script. Finally, in addition to the lack of reality that a detective would simply force his way into the home of a man who would assuredly be considered a key suspect by even Springfiled Police Chief Ralph Wiggum, the relationship between him and the male lead just wasn't plausible in any way, they lacked chemistry, and the sex scene between, in addition to being purely gratuitous (like so much of the other nudity and sexuality in the film), was also poorly reasoned in having the Andreas Thomas character (Manny) all of a sudden want the detective to top him. This was also made even more nonsensical by the ending, having the Manny character end up with his best friend, which is not supported by anything else that has taken place in the film earlier.I have nothing against sex and nudity in films, however in this movie it just so clearly exists to try to create a soft core porn movie and makes little sense to the story, except that it takes places in a web cam chat room environment. A better plot, such as perhaps a serial killer in a gay gym, would have accomplished this in a more logical manner.

This is the worst gay film I have ever seen. And, as a member of the Stonewall generation, babes, I've seen 'em all. The most disturbing thing about this movie is its soft-core eye candy. The experience of watching this film mimicked one of those horrid chat room conversations with a hottie who turns out to be a vacant narcissist in an Adonis suit. If the acting hadn't been so abominable, this parallel universe to the real gay universe on line might have been amusing. If it had been a farce, it might have been amusing. If it had been populated with bad drag queens, it might have been amusing. It was none of these things. It was just a bad movie, badly written, badly acted, and badly designed. Amir Darvish was the only minor exception to the general lack of redeeming features of this opus. What a waste of pixels.

I rushed to the cinema yesterday to make this movie (which was shown as part of the "Verzaubert" Gay Film Festival that takes place each year in the major German cities and which normally shows really good stuff. Anyway, I was looking forward to it (though I am female and straight, I find a lot of gay movies well made and interesting; something else from the usual Hollywood crap!!). However, even though I am definitely not an expert on acting, it was quite blatant even to me that this was extremely poor acting, by almost every character involved!! The lines sounded so studied, there was nothing spontaneous or witty about them. I did find the plot somewhat interesting, but it could have been made into a much better movie, in my opinion. I also did not find the actors particularly dishy, which surprised me as they normally have quite the lookers in gay movies !! I also did not see the necessity for the drawn-out and lengthy sex scenes -- what purpose did they serve?? I mean, this was not meant to be a porn movie, as far as I understood.... Anyway, I considered it a waste of time and money!!

'OPEN CAM' could have been so much more than it is. Writer/director Robert Gaston takes a few risks with this latest entry into the gay cinema foray, adding a story that avoids the usual topics that stereotype gay men. He assembled a cast of young actors whose best attributes are physical appearance rather than technical training, and then covers the dialogue with incessant background music that makes the viewer strain for the conversations - and much worse, he hides behind the mores of restraint that prevents US films from achieving what European films do well.The story revolves around a recently jilted young artist Manny (Andreau Thomas) who when not in front of the easel spends his time on the Internet dating on a sleazy chat line, keeping his physical encounters anonymous to avoid personal disappointment. On the Internet chat line (using 'open camera') some murders are captured and a detective Hamilton (Amir Darvish) takes over the investigation - a detective who also happens to be gay and acts out with just about anyone it seems. When Manny's friends (or ex tricks) begin to fall victim to the serial killer on the Internet, Hamilton moves in with Manny to protect him, and it is in this living situation (a very physical arrangement) that the serial killer is finally caught on camera and in person. How the episodes of loss of friends and re-establishment of trust and love replacing just lust brings the story to a bit of a disappointing end.The cast (Andreau Thomas, Amir Darvish, Ben Green, J. Matthew Miller, Christian Jones, et al) are a good-looking group of men. There are a lot of sensual scenes, but unlike European films the men who are supposed to be nude for a reason are shot to protect them from full frontal exposure - and that seems so very ludicrous and insulting given the theme of the film. American cinema has a long way to go: even movies of heightened physicality in straight films have little problem showing every detail of the female body yet either blur or out-of-focus shoot or drape male bodies as though there were some secret that MUST remain off camera. Time to grow up - and where better to start than in films such as OPEN CAM. 'Tis pity....Grady Harp