Go-Get-'Em, Haines (1936)

Powerful

Overrated

Don't listen to the negative reviews

The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

"Go-Get 'Em, Haines" is one of the classical early crime movies. In black and white, it tells us the story of a newspaper agent, who accidentally enters an ocean liner and becomes witness of a murder, he afterwards tries to solve.The film includes all the elements you's expect from such a title. You have the lead character as a hero, who is both smart and eloquent. You have different characters with a motive, that make it hard to guess, who the actual murderer is. And of course you have the love story between the reporter and a beautiful young lady, that finds its climax in a kiss and a marriage. You even have the humorous sidekick, who is, as always, more disturbing than funny. On one hand you could thus say, that this is a rather standardized movie, on the other hand it still has an interesting plot and doesn't do any grave mistakes.All in all I had fun watching this title. It is surely not a masterpiece or anything alike but it is a nice little story, depicted in a well-known way. If you like those early crime movies, this could be a thing for you.

William Boyd took a break from Hopalong Cassidy to do this B movie mystery for Republic Pictures in which he plays an investigative reporter hot on the trail of a Samuel Insull like utility magnate who is fleeing and absconding with a whole lot of his investor's money.The culprit Lee Shumway takes a passenger liner bound for Europe and Boyd follows him on board and sails with him. During an amateur theatrical production on shipboard someone slips real bullets into a gun and Shumway is shot dead. There are a host of suspects as a whole lot of people lost money investing with the dead magnate.Go Get 'Em Haines which sounds like a rousing sports drama instead of a murder mystery is a nicely paced mystery which we have to give some allowances for as it is the product of a B film studio. Herbert J. Yates didn't exactly bust the budget for this one, but Boyd does nicely in the role.Alas though for his career and for better or worse he was Hopalong Cassidy and the public wasn't going to accept at this point as anything else.

This should only be a genre-film "6 of 10" stars, but I've given it an extra star on the basis of William Boyd's performance. Although Boyd always entertained as Hopalong Cassidy, His eventual identification with that role alone essentially tunneled him out of any notice as the highly talented naturalistic actor that he was. He really shines in this film as a headstrong but clever reporter trying to discover why there would be two different murders of the same man.The rest of the film is typical of "Poverty Row" efforts of the time,although above average in its pacing - and once the mystery kicks in, it is surprisingly effective, playing with and against audience expectations in a way that leaves the discovery of who-done-it a surprise.As to the narrative that leads up to the mystery - it's breezy and not without its entertainment value. I admit considerable continuity lapses, but th pacing rushes us past them, so I won't complain.Most reviews I've seen complain of the musical number in the middle of the film, but anyone who knows the comic song tradition that came out of Vaudeville like "Second Hand Rose" or "Harrigan") will recognize it as a novelty song, and rather a charming one at that.But at any rate, at only about a hour's run, it's worth it to see Boyd in grand form as someone other than the cowboy savant, Hopalong.

This film has one of the very very rare roles where William Boyd wasn't Hopalong Cassidy once he started in that role. Here Boyd plays a reporter who is told to get the scoop on a millionaire who's utility company is tanking, taking with it the fortunes of many small time investors. Arriving at the rich man's house he sees someone that looks like his man sneaking out a back door. Giving chase he follows him to the docks and on to a ship heading for Europe. Soon things become complicated as murders on board on on land occur.This is a nifty fast moving thriller. Boyd wanders through the film as if he owns the place and its clear why he was a big star. its also clear that had he been able to do something other than Hopalong he might have been even bigger (would that have been possible?). The mystery itself is a bit convoluted and I'm not sure the film plays fair (I blindly guessed the killer before we had even met all of the suspects) but its no matter since whats of interest here is the interplay between Boyd and the rest of the cast and the ship board setting. If there is any weakness its the musical number that takes place as part of a shipboard entertainment, it's not that its bad, it just that its filler. Worth a look.