The Hangover Part II (2011)

Horrible, fascist and poorly acted

It's not great by any means, but it's a pretty good movie that didn't leave me filled with regret for investing time in it.

n my opinion it was a great movie with some interesting elements, even though having some plot holes and the ending probably was just too messy and crammed together, but still fun to watch and not your casual movie that is similar to all other ones.

Clever and entertaining enough to recommend even to members of the 1%

Two years after the bachelor party in Las Vegas, Phil, Stu, Alan, and Doug jet to Thailand for Stu's wedding. Stu's plan for a subdued pre-wedding brunch, however, goes seriously awry. The Hangover Part II recycles the exact same plot just like the original but it's a rare recycle of a comedy Franchise that actually works although not as much as the first time for sure. The perfomances once again were very good by the 3 main leads but also i enjoyed Paul Giamatti's role too. It's a film that has it's flaws but it's also a fun sequel as well. (7.5/10)

The Hangover Part II is a continuation of the same title released in 2009 movie, the premise is the same as the first, the difference is what goes on in Hancock, all the actors from the first film is back, Doug character appears little as in the first film, but now it is not so important in the film's plot, but the brother of Stu, Chow has increased participation in this film, unfortunately the Hangover Part II is much lower than its predecessor, the film is less funny, is unnecessary scenes, and few moments are funny, the scene at the club is even good, plus most are bland, like the monk of time I found it very bland, the direction of Todd Phillips is more absent, and script had no creativity, he practically took the plot of the first film, and put somewhere else instead of Las Vegas, and put another character as a key piece, the Hangover part II is much lower than the first film, has some funny moments, more in yes the film is full of scenes bland and no creative script. 5.2

'Hangover Part II', is an American offering, which probably cost a small fortune to make and also did amazingly well at the box office. I had no excuse for watching it, as every single review panned it mercilessly; and well should they have done. I had previously seen Hangover 1, which although fairly banal, did contain some good, original humour and was well acted by the main protagonists.As those who have read about Hangover II or, like me, have had the misfortune to watch it will know, the sequel simply uses all the gags from the first movie. It transplants them to some kind of crazy, make- believe Asian state, occasionally referred to as Thailand, (although the local people are referred to as 'Asiatics' not Thai), but which bears no resemblance to any country that I have ever had the misfortune to live in.Not that this would matter if the film was entertaining; but it isn't. It is total, unadulterated crap without a single redeeming feature.Quite possibly one of the worst films I have ever seen.

The movie doesn't really have anything new to present. It basically runs on the first movie's story and characters. It just changed the location setting from Las Vegas to Bangkok. It sure is quite nice to have a different location and culture influencing the story. But seriously, the plot is simply the same, right to the very details. The only difference in the plot is that this time it is Stu's wedding instead of Doug's, and this time Doug didn't get into trouble. But having everything work out just as the first movie did is just boring. Fortunately this time the comedies are a bit better. We get to see hilarious craziness in them. The ladyboy, everything with Chow, and of course the monkey, are the things that made the comedies worth laughing at. Particularly the monkey is the funniest of those gimmicks.. The acting overall is just as the same as the first movie, if not lower. Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms and Zhac Galifianakis successfully reprised their respective designated roles.