UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Horror >

Fright Night 2: New Blood

Fright Night 2: New Blood (2013)

October. 01,2013
|
4.3
|
R
| Horror Comedy

By day Gerri Dandridge is a sexy professor, but by night she transforms into a real-life vampire with an unquenchable thirst for human blood. When a group of high school students travel abroad to study in Romania, they find themselves ensnared in her chilling web of lust and terror. Charlie and 'Evil' Ed must stop Gerri from drinking and bathing in the blood of a 'new moon virgin', who just so happens to be Charlie’s ex-girlfriend.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

CheerupSilver
2013/10/01

Very Cool!!!

More
Moustroll
2013/10/02

Good movie but grossly overrated

More
GazerRise
2013/10/03

Fantastic!

More
Caryl
2013/10/04

It is a whirlwind of delight --- attractive actors, stunning couture, spectacular sets and outrageous parties. It's a feast for the eyes. But what really makes this dramedy work is the acting.

More
Eddie Cantillo
2013/10/05

Fright Night 2: New Blood(2013) Starring: Will Payne, Sean Power, Sacha Parkinson, Chris Waller, Jaime Murray, John-Christian Bateman, Liana Margineanu, Alina Minzu, Adi Hostiuc, Joelle Coutinho, Ada Gales, Constantin Barbulescu, G Catalin Banghea, Calin Andrei Razvan, Marius Chivu, Roxana Girleanu, Nicholas Lupu, Deliu Ionut, Andreea Mihalascu, Ana Maria Saragia, Costinel Lenghel, Banica Gheorghe, Banica Gheorghe,Mihai Verbintschi, Carmen Popa, Anastasia Pirogova, Dalila Poch, Ian Fisher Directed By: Eduardo Rodríguez Review NEW BLOOD Hello Kiddies your pal the Crypt-Critic is here with some rotten blood. I mean wow was this stupid and totally unnecessary. The Fright Night franchise started in 1985 with the cult-classic from Tom Holland, got a sequel. Years later the same thing happens remake style, we get a great remake of the original Fright Night with Collin Farrel and then this shitty sequel. This sequel has the exact same plot, beat by beat. If you've seen the original, the remake with Collin Farell then you basically have seen this movie. The only minor differences I can point out are is there is a school about I believe it's Romanian history and they talk about vampires and they say Dracula is a woman. Which the main vampire who is after Charlie and Amy is a woman, there professor. Peter Vincet goes to a strip club and doesn't get his show cancelled. Last difference which is actually a positive about the film it has a cool fight between Evil Ed and Charlie. You couldn't find a reason this film was mad even if there was a book about it. It accomplishes nothing and is a disgrace to vampires for not being scary and for just sucking, I have seen vampire films that people say are awful but I like to those people watch this then come talk to me. The acting if you can even call it that is one dimensional and lackluster because we've already seen two great films with these characters, I mean I give the actors credit for trying but trying doesn't give you a lot of brownie points in an awful movie. Fright Night 2: New Blood has the worst acting, no originality, spits on one of the most vilest villains in cinema history by making him a woman and is just downright awful, I hated this movie.

More
chris-cody
2013/10/06

This film does seem to pass over the 2011 Fright Night remake. It borrows many elements from the original Fright Night and its sequel. However, this does not make a film entirely devoid of entertainment. If you have not seen any previous versions of Fright Night then there may even be some surprises. If you have then it is quite enjoying ticking off the various 'nods' towards the previous movies. I felt the characters of Charley, Amy and 'Evil' seemed to be based more on their 80's versions than their 2011 incarnations. I also particularly enjoyed the teasing cat-and-mouse game employed by Gerri Dandridge upon Charley. Though I was slightly confused as to why he seemed to be specifically chosen for this.Overall, a fun little vampire flick that should divert your attentions away from the boredom of an average evening.Possible spoiler and pedantic point: Wasn't Elizabeth Bathory Hungarian not Romanian? Was this supposed to be explained by the mixing with the Dracula myth?

More
richardbutch
2013/10/07

First of all this movie is not part 2 to the Fright Night remake from 2011. It is a remake of the 1985 original Fright Night and the 2011 remake. So it is the 2nd remake of Fright Night 1. The characters Charlie Brewster, Evil Ed, Amy Peterson, Peter Vincent and vampire Dandrige are here as in the original, however this time the location is set in Romania. I was entertained from beginning to end. The special effects were great considering this is a made for video movie. Lots of blood and guts you get the idea. So rent or buy this movie, get some popcorn and enjoy. Don't think of this movie as a remake because it still is not as good as the original and you may be disappointed. Think of it as a modern vampire movie set in Romania and you will most likely enjoy it.

More
Shopaholic35
2013/10/08

I wanna cry so bad. Fright Night with Colin Farrell was hilariously good but Fright Night 2 was terrible. I completely knew that it was a new cast and probably wouldn't have much to do with the first one but I was still hoping for better. The acting was D-List and not directed well. Probably the one thing I did like was the idea behind the lead female vampire and who she was. Congratulations on thinking slightly out of the box.Overall this movie was a bitter disappointment with very few frightful moments. It was lacking in suspense and you ended up not caring if the cast lived or died. They were all kind of awkward and their behaviour at times was bordering on inappropriate. Do yourself a favour and give this one a miss.

More