Flight of Fury (2007)

Waste of time

One of my all time favorites.

Memorable, crazy movie

Excellent but underrated film

The only good thing about this movie is the girl-on-girl scene (that was unnecessary anyway). Also , the movie is basically a remake of one of Michael Dudikoff's movies - "Black thunder" , I believe . Yet , Seagal and the writer claim that this is an original piece of work . I guess this was something different for Seagal in his career.Original or not , this movie SUCKS. Big time . Everything here is bad. The unimaginative dialogues , the visually ugly fight scenes , lame flight scenes and crappy acting . Really , this movie screams "Were making this for money".I give it 1/10.

Another typical (these days) monotone whispering, chubby stick up his ass walking wanna be action movie. The acting was lousy, the script was lousy and the cuts to stock military footage were lousy. The only good part was the brief gratuitous girl on girl scene and the many mistakes in the movie, which made it all the more laughable. My favorite is the scene where they cut the power to the electric fence. Who would ever put the control box on the outside of the fence? Or Segal stepping out of flying an SR-71 across the world wearing construction work boots? Or the nurse in the military hospital wearing a tight mini skirt? I could go on but you get the idea. If you want a movie that is mindless and maybe slightly more exciting than having jury duty...then this is the one for you!

I've tried sitting through the entire duration for this twice now, and each time I've failed. The lackadaisical approach here is an understatement. We have many scenes with characters just wandering around, shooting at nothing, with plot points that don't even make sense. Apparently this is a shoot by shoot remake of Michael Dudikoff's Black Thunder. I've not seen that movie, so I can't say, but if it is anything like this, I won't be looking forward to it. It's incredibly cheap looking. It consists of stock footage for a lot of the plane shots, and Seagal looks bored to tears, phoning it in at least in almost every scene. The most unintentionally funny scene has to be when two chicks make out, and Seagal sits and watches with a blank and expressionless stare. Come on bud its chicks, at least show a little emotion. I remain a fan of Seagal despite his laziness now a days, and I guess I am a sucker for punishment for checking out his recent works.Performances. Steven Seagal. Seagal honestly could care less about this project, and I know that for a fact. He runs around with a machine gun, seemingly just shooting wildly in the air, aiming at nothing. He mumbles his way through the part, and doesn't even show emotion during critical plot points. He once more wears baggy clothing to hide his fat belly. He does occasional fighting, but really just a couple of mediocre snippets of it.Bottom line. If you got this far in the review, you will know how torturous I find this movie to be. Watching dry paint on a wall, is more entertaining than this. Please even if you are a die-hard fan of his, stay away. There is nothing entertaining about this movie.0/10

FLIGHT OF FURY takes the mantle of being the very WORST Steven Seagal flick I've ever seen...up to now.It's a dreadful bore with no action scenes of any interest, Seagal isn't really trying in this - he's fat and his voice is dubbed once more.The co-stars fare no better, being a rather sorry load of 3rd raters.The Direction by Keusch is very poor and it comes as no surprise that he's also responsible for another couple of Seagal stinkers (SHADOW MAN & ATTACK FORCE) The screenplay Co-written by Seagal himself is laughably inept.According to IMDb $12M was spent on this boring load of old tosh - more like $1.2MFLIGHT OF FURY is actually a shot for shot remake of the Michael Dudikoff flick BLACK THUNDER - A B-movie remake of a B-movie.This has NO redeeming qualities whatsoever,Give it a MISS! 1/2 *