The Special Relationship (2010)

Best movie of this year hands down!

There's no way I can possibly love it entirely but I just think its ridiculously bad, but enjoyable at the same time.

It is a whirlwind of delight --- attractive actors, stunning couture, spectacular sets and outrageous parties.

The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

The film The special relationship is a sequel of the film The deal, which I also reviewed on IMDb. The Deal describes how Tony Blair attains the leadership of the English Labour Party. His competitor was Gordon Brown ("When Brown leaves the room, the lights go on"). In the sequel the first years of Blair in power as prime minister of England are depicted. The ideology of the old Labour Party had become totally obsolete, and thus Blair tried to modernize her. He was impressed by the ideas of the New Democrats, after their political break-through under Bill Clinton. The Special relationship tells how Clinton and Blair desire to introduce the doctrine of the New Democrats on a global scale. In England she is called the Third Way (compromise between old liberalism and conservatism). Note however the complaint of the English opposition: "Blair has done more U-turns than a dodgy plumber". Of course Clinton is even more ludicrous, due to his affair with Lewinsky. For instance, why does Clinton wear boxer shirts? To keep his ankles warm. Or, a majority of the American women replies to the question "Would you sleep with Clinton?" with "Never again". Nevertheless the producers manage to sketch a vivid and captivating picture of the association between the two leaders and their wives. Indeed the affair and the possible impeachment form a part of the story. Of course the conversations are fictitious, so that realism is not guaranteed. Undoubtedly the importance of Blair is exaggerated, for instance when one of his ministers says: "In the public approval you (Blair) are the number one leader of the world". This mild form of nationalism may be repugnant for American viewers. But the producers are realistic enough to admit that Clinton possesses more power. Blair remains the junior partner. For me as a European is was strange to see the contempt of Blair with respect to the French president Chirac. Still this may be true. Certainly the support of Blair for the American invasion in Irak made him very unpopular on the Continent. In conclusion, The special relationship may stick to the English point of view, but it is made with skill and therefore recommendable. Don't forget to leave comments. I love it.

As we are about to attack another country under the guise of protecting human rights, this HBO movie hits the spot. Bill Clinton and Tony Blair, two fake progressives, shape the world according to their interests and political advantages. Tony Blair, as portrayed in this flick, is a naive, almost comical in his ineptitude, character. After all the unfulfilled promises and outright lies it is not surprising how unpopular he became in Great Britain. Blindly following both American presidents, but all this time building his own legacy. And he built it all right. When he left the office his approval rating was embarrassingly low. After the horrendous war campaign waged on Serbia in 1999 ( based on intentionally inflated numbers of victims, that were never found), and attack on Iraq( based on non-existing WMD), Mr. Blair is lucky that he didn't end up on trial for war crimes himself. God help us all with leaders like these people.

The joy of writer Peter Morgan's films about British politics is the seductive plausibility of their imaginative reality. Instead of brimming with vicious cynicism, he's more interested in inventing a human dimension behind the strange public faces of figures such as Blair, Brown, and the royal family. In this film, his third featuring Martin Sheen playing Blair as an over-eager schoolboy, the greatest delight came in the deft (and surprisingly soft) portrayal of his wife Cherie. And yet the limits of the approach are maybe more apparent in this film than in the other two, both of which focused on his earlier career. Morgan takes his script in the right direction - to explore how Blair came to support the neo-conservative policies of Geroge W. Bush (although portraying Bill Clinton as Blair's social democratic conscience is frankly a bit rich). But the absence of any focus on British domestic policy seems a bit limiting. Blair's recently published memoirs indicate that a man who once a popular hero who saved the British Labour party from self-destruction now appears in agreement with the right on more than just foreign policy. And in spite of the attractive thesis of Morgan's story, I don't think that this can be entirely explained in terms of personal chemistry. But it's fun to imagine that it was.

Dennis Quaid and Mr. Sheen are excellent in the roles of Clinton and Tony Blair respectively.This starts out as Blair being a novice, and quite "nerdy." He looks for Clinton to be a mentor to him. Both are basically liberal and they want to change society from the right that has dominated both countries.It is the Sheen character that really matures as the film goes on. He takes the command regarding Kosovo and comes to Clinton's aid during the Monica Lewinsky scandal.I question the performance of Hope Davis as Hillary Clinton here. While it is true that Hillary has been depicted for her rather cold veneer, Davis seems to miss the mark. It is only when she is senator-elect that she embodies Hillary Clinton.The woman playing Cherie Blair is excellent.There is a good taste of history in this film with the peace efforts in Ireland between Sinn Fein and the IRA.With the style change of a George W. Bush, the film ends, but we have to remember that Blair was an ardent support of Bush's policy is Iraq.