Night of the Living Dead 3D (2006)
Barricaded in a farmhouse, a woman and a collegian must contend with flesh-eating zombies and a malevolent mortician.
Watch Trailer
Cast
Similar titles
Reviews
This Movie Can Only Be Described With One Word.
That was an excellent one.
everything you have heard about this movie is true.
if their story seems completely bonkers, almost like a feverish work of fiction, you ain't heard nothing yet.
Barb and her brother Johnny arrive late for the burial of their aunt -- and walk straight into a nightmare,with zombies... Barb flees the cemetery and is rescued by Ben, a local college student. The two seek refuge in the nearby farmhouse, where the laid-back residents aren't remotely prepared to have their lives turn into a nightmare.....It's only an hour and fifteen minutes long and Sid Haig is int, so I thought to myself 'why not?'. Its short and it would be funny to spot where all the 3D should have been.It starts off okay, we have references to the original Romero version, and the zombie action kicks off almost instantly. And then there more references to the original, by way of showing the original on TVs scattered across the movie, and this continues throughout..The film soon becomes tiresome, very quickly. We get the usual trope characters, nudity for no good reason, and really poor performances.Even the 3D parts are pointless, as there are hardly any in the movie. One saving grace is that I didn't see it in 3D, that would have been the iceberg on the proverbial cake.Of all the Romero remakes and sequels, Day of The Dead 2009, and Survival of the Dead included, this has to be the worse one I've ever seen.Really pointless, and a waste of time, even at this short length.
OK, so this is pretty bad (it is a fairly low budget zombie flick), but I think its a lot better than its given credit for. There are a few honesty clever lines, such as "Maybe we're being punked" lol, cute. The silly little plays on Mary Jane/drug culture are decent little inside jokes. Also, I liked the fact that they actually commented on the smell of the corpses, cuz in reality long decayed corpses would be so ripe as to induce immediate vomiting upon nasal contact. The explanation for the outbreak is actually pretty decent and funny, I like the purposeful play on the fast/slow zombie controversy. On the idiotic side, they were just watching the original "Night of the Living Dead", and yet they didn't think about the bite infecting them or the whole you have to hit them in the head thing. On a side note , the Left Behind books, puuuuuuuke x.x The serious stuff is pretty da*n sappy, and come on people, a matrix-style bullet for no reason? You really shoulda put that money into some decent gore, it leaves a bit to be desired. The ending is just plain stupid. Still, it could have been a lot lot worse. I definitely thought it was worth watching.
First off I've watched close to 100 zombie movies....Must say to start with this is for true zombie fans only! overall really enjoyed watching this with the 3d glasses the acting was quite believable very entertaining, some very cool zombie death scenes,I've noticed most people bashing the movie but I've seen WAY worse easily a 7 out of 10 most people have to realize the budget going into this movie and to not expect it to have the same effect as the original...i respect the classics but common as if the original was so bad ass....i think this one did way better then most of the night of the living dead series if you think back #3 and #4 where terribly worse then this movie i thought this put a decent spin on the zombie genre and tosses in its own adventure with some very cool 3d shots
This movie was absolutely terrible. Bad acting, bad special effects, ridiculous uninspired writing, truly an insult to legacy of Romero in every way.Not much more to be said, an embarrassing effort not even worthy of scifi channel status.Do yourself a favor and pass this weak effort by. I diddn't even want to finish it, but I did and I can honestly say it never gets any better.The only way to make this enjoyable would be to give it the Mystery Science Theater treatment, then it would be tolerable. No one in this movie was even slightly believable and had the combined acting depth of a puddle, INCLUDING their poster boy.