Python 2 (2002)

Best movie of this year hands down!

Great Film overall

A Masterpiece!

This story has more twists and turns than a second-rate soap opera.

Python (2000) BOMB (out of 4) Robert England plays a mad scientist who created a huge python that spits acid. I'm terrified of snakes, which means I usually have a good time being scared with snake movies but this one here was downright awful and ranks as one of the worst films I've seen the past twenty years. The acting is atrocious, the screenplay laughable and the special effects are terrible looking.Python 2 (2002) BOMB (out of 4) The American government brings home an eight-five foot snake, which eventually escapes and starts eating people. This is another horrid, direct to video horror movie but it's slightly better than the first film since this one here runs ten minutes shorter. Is that any kind of recommendation?

This film is an awful and boneless piece of junk that does not even make up for the original failure, Python. In fact it includes all of from the faults from the first one plus a whole bunch of new ones! The plot is basic trash taken to a new level: the American army captures a uselessly large and unhappy python, but the plane which is transporting it crashes, as usual, and the safe(best word to describe it) containing the beast is taken by the Russian army who takes it to a military base and... opens it. You know the rest. This is Anaconda mixed with Alien, but without the quality. The actors are a pointless bunch of nondescript idiots who include a would-be murderer base-ball player(ludicrous) and a character from the previous episode, the useless and pathetic failed FBI agent. The snake is even more awful than in the first one because there are TWO of them. ARRGGGG! Two times sixty feet of awfulness! Things I learned from this movie: -Whopping enormous pythons are common in Russia. -Whopping ginormous pythons will fit easily into a tiny safe-like box. -Base-ball players can kill people with a ball.

below average sequel is weakly made and directed and plus it's not that particularly exciting and is dull to boot and the snake effects are really shoddy and has some lame flashbacks from the original the acting is so William Zabaka is really good here once again but this time around he is a lot different then he used to be SPOILERS!!!! you will see why near the end of the film Simmone Mackinnon is alright here and didn't convince me all that much and lets her accent do the acting Dana Ashbrook and Alex Jolig do alright Jolig lets his accent do the acting as well i really have nothing more to say other then Don't bother *1/2 out of 5 there is no one to root for either so all the characters except Larson are unlikable

I was puzzled by the credits being mostly Russian names. Then I realized this was a movie set in Russia that actually WAS shot in Russia!So I say, cut it some slack. A stray thought-- the actors playing soldiers in the film probably WERE former members of the Red Army! They certainly had the moves. And the CGI serpents are pretty dang good! I was impressed by a couple of sequences. In one, the snake's underside reflects the light of the flamethrower being used (ineffectually) against it. The other nicely-done sequence is lifted from Gandalf's "death" in LotR: TFotR, with a serpent playing the Balrog role.