The Brotherhood III: Young Demons (2003)

Memorable, crazy movie

A lot of perfectly good film show their cards early, establish a unique premise and let the audience explore a topic at a leisurely pace, without much in terms of surprise. this film is not one of those films.

Story: It's very simple but honestly that is fine.

It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.

I seem to have been duped worse than other site posters.... I paid $20 for this movie in an effort to see just how bad it was. I got more entertainment from reading this site's comments on the movie than ever I got from watching it. Substandard acting and a nonexistent plot converge to create what can only be described as the worst film of my life. It reminded me of Blair Witch in that it could easily have been filmed by a group of high school students set loose at night with a camera and a fog machine. All that was lacking was a snotty-nose scene. In conclusion, I'd have a hedgehog forcibly inserted into my rectum before I'd consent to view this film again.Translation: Don't do it!

Probably a third of my DVD collection is composed of Horror/Fantasy/Science Fiction movies, with a growing number being direct to video. Some of those direct to video movies are pretty good. "Mimic" is one of my favorites. This one leaves a clear understanding why it never saw a big screen.There is minimal plot (many good horror flicks have survived this); There is virtually no acting taking place (ok, so the genre isn't noted for Academy Award winning performances); the special effects, if that's what they are to be called, would embarrass an high school stage manager; and, well, there really is not a single thing to recommend this movie. The two most annoying aspects are the almost constant use of a fog machine, day and night, in what is supposed to be a public high school . . . and . . . the excessive use of slow motion which could have been eliminated and would have made this horrible (not horror) movie about a half hour shorter.Be wiser than I, don't let this thing ever rotate across your optical laser.

this movie (if you can call it that even) is THE WORST movie i've ever seen. so many things wrong, where do i start? I had to fast forward through the movie every 5 seconds, it was basically just ppl walking around trying to avoid this dude dressed in black. there is no suspense, no nothing because they just keep walking around and it gets so boring that you have to fastforward in order to keep yourself awake. and what was the plot? i made the mistake of paying $3.69 for it, when i could have rented another horror movie worthy of the $3.69 price, like Hannibal or something. This movie was soo bad, this doesnt even start to describe how dumb and pointless it was. I was so angry when i was watching it, the people in there CAN NOT act, they were just reading lines with no emotion. For all you wanna be film makers out there, i recommend you rent this as a guide to what NOT TO DO when you make movies. > you can take notes on what not to do when making a movie. i cant belive they got 3 of them out. its HORRIBLE!!!

Considering myself to be a veteran of pretty much all Dave Decoteau's movies, when this one landed express delivery from Amazon on my doorstep, I yelped with excitement and hurried it into my DVD player.Looking at all the previous comments, predominantly in the negative, I have to say that I myself am more than happy with Mr. Decoteau's creative output since launching Rapid Heart. I know I'm not likely to be comparing it to one of Romero's, Fulci's or Argento's, but I do know it will sit very well in my DVD collection alongside most Full Moon films and their alumni. So , to sum up, hats off to Dave Decoteau for churning out another homoerotic journey into the underworld.