Run, Simon, Run (1970)

Sadly Over-hyped

A lot of perfectly good film show their cards early, establish a unique premise and let the audience explore a topic at a leisurely pace, without much in terms of surprise. this film is not one of those films.

One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.

The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

Burt Reynolds restrained performance as an Indian framed for murdering his own Brother, is the only surprise in this tedious time waster. The uneasy culture clash between the upper crust and the poor Indians is played for all it's worth. The problem is this comparison does not elicit sympathy, but instead comes across as nothing more than padding for an over simplified revenge story. The Arizona scenery is fine, including several surprisingly effective wide, wide angle zoom shots. Creative camera work cannot save "Run Simon Run" however, because the romance seems unrealistic, the eventual confrontation between Reynolds and his Brother's killer is poorly staged, and the credits roll, leaving the viewer rather dissatisfied. - MERK

Throughout this film, Simon and his people are called the Papago Indians. Well, I looked them up and apparently the correct term is the Tohono O'odham people--the name the tribe use to describe themselves. Odd that the film never mentions this as it's supposed to be a film that elevates them and their status.When the story begins, Simon (Burt Reynolds) is being released from prison after serving a long sentence for murdering his brother. He was innocent and railroaded...but there's not much he can do about it now, as the man responsible is apparently dead. He's met by a do-gooder social worker, Carroll (Inger Stevens)--a rich lady who appears to be trying to save the poor Papago.Later, Simon learns that the man responsible for the murder is actually NOT dead...but is hiding because he expects Simon to come looking for him. So, Carroll inexplicably agrees to pay some private investigators to find him...knowing that Simon plans on murdering him. Why would she do this? Did they teach her this in her social work training program?!Subtle, this film is not! Too often the sound track consists of Indian drums and when Simon goes to a party, folks start asking him to do a rain dance! This comes off as pretty stupid and almost cartoony. The IDEA of the film, with the conflict between contemporary society and the Papago/Tohono O'odham is a good one...but the way it's handled could have been so much better.

I think Leonard Cohen said it best: "I've seen the nations rise and fall, I've heard their stories, heard them all, but love's the only engine of survival"A movie that has a love story for a baseline, along with a side story (revenge in this case, same in John Woo's "The killer"), is the best representation of movie making.While looking like what it is, a 70's movie (without a cheesy soundtrack), "Run, Simon, Run" is driven by great script, subtle acting, and on-the-money editing.Still, by far, my most favorite film of all times.(Closely followed by "The Killer" :D)

On its own terms, in its context, Run Simon Run is meant to tell the story of an unrepentently angry loner seeking dignity for himself and his tribe. But, he has so alienated is fellow tribesmen, the white authorities, and well-meaning social workers, small victories exact terribly high consequences. The dialogue is rather Spartan, so Reynolds's performance must carry the film for it to work. he stretches his acting muscles to deliver a brooding portrait of a committed, volatile, and tortured soul. Inger Stevens, on the other hand, for the most part, is just brooding -- a rather one-note performance that doesn't qualify high in her gallery -- a more hopeful counterpoint to Reynolds' virtuoso angst would have served this TV movie better. I'm not saying her performance is bad, but it leaves Run Simon Run as a very good made-for-TV movie in lieu of a great one. This is also slow at spots, but the overall running time is so short, it's not that problematic. Certainly worth seeing once.