UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Adventure >

George of the Jungle 2

George of the Jungle 2 (2003)

October. 21,2003
|
3.3
|
PG
| Adventure Comedy Family

George and Ursula now have a son, George Junior, so Ursula's mother arrives to try and take them back to "civilization".

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Reviews

TrueJoshNight
2003/10/21

Truly Dreadful Film

More
Beystiman
2003/10/22

It's fun, it's light, [but] it has a hard time when its tries to get heavy.

More
Senteur
2003/10/23

As somebody who had not heard any of this before, it became a curious phenomenon to sit and watch a film and slowly have the realities begin to click into place.

More
Josephina
2003/10/24

Great story, amazing characters, superb action, enthralling cinematography. Yes, this is something I am glad I spent money on.

More
limelemonrocks
2003/10/25

I saw this movie again with my dad, and we thought it turned out to be better than the first live action film. George of the Jungle 2 didn't star Brendan Fraser as George in this one. Chris Showermen does the role this time around as George. Chris Showermen was an amazing George, he even played the part better then Brendan Fraser! This is funnier than the first! Keith Scott returns as being the narrator with some funnier jokes that will make you laugh out loud. Most of the jungle animals talk in this sequel, like the mean lion and some other animals. Thomas Haden Church comes back as Lyle, and John Cleese returns as being an ape named ape. I was surprised how good this turned out to be! Me new George, studio to cheep to pay Brendan Fraser! Do you agree that Showermen made a better George, or not? I agree, do you?

More
lqe
2003/10/26

Let me start out by saying this movie has 1 funny point at the very beginning with the exchange between the narrator and George: Narrator:Huh? Wait a minute! Who the heck are you? George: Me new George. Studio too cheap to pay Brendan Fraser. Narrator: How did you get the part? George: New George just lucky, I guess. Sadly, that's the only funny part in the entire movie.It was still entertaining...But then again, i'm easily entertained...I wouldn't say this is the worst movie i've ever seen (that title goes to the terribly un-funny Disaster Movie...), This movie falls #7 on my bottom 15 list...If your a small child who is easily entertained, you'll enjoy this movie. If you're a movie-watcher who wants a good, funny movie, You'll end up shooting yourself halfway through this one..

More
xredgarnetx
2003/10/27

Caught part of GEORGE 2 on TV recently, but couldn't get myself to watch it through to the end. Just awful! I can't even remember the plot. All I know is that George and Ursula were not the George and Ursula of the first movie, which was bad enough. There's a lot of scrambling around, but the direction and editing were so shoddy and choppy, it was like watching outtakes or deleted scenes. Having the original voice of Ape the Ape back was not nearly enough to make me warm up to this. GEORGE 2 is probably the single worst sequel I have ever seen, and that is saying something. Jeez, because of IMDb's 10 lines rule, I have to keep typing when I have nothing more to say about this crapulastic made-for-TV sequel. Disney, hang your head in shame.

More
ctweb
2003/10/28

Could have been funny, but our family was turned off by the bathroom humor of this supposedly "G" movie. It wasn't enough to have people kicked in the genitals or be urinated on. No, one of the scenes includes birds defecating on the animals and a treaty to fix it. One of the fight scenes includes throwing wet animal feces and using fiery flatulence as a flamethrower. This movie is not appropriate for children under age of 13.Disney seems to have departed from the old slapstick humor guidelines of getting hit with something wet/messy that is not gross. The same plot and fight could have been done with rotting fruit and not changed the overall theme of the movie

More