UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Comedy >

No Strings Attached

No Strings Attached (2011)

January. 21,2011
|
6.2
|
R
| Comedy Romance

Emma is a busy doctor who sets up a seemingly perfect arrangement when she offers her best friend Adam a relationship with one rule: No strings attached. But when a fling becomes a thing, can sex friends stay best friends?

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Claysaba
2011/01/21

Excellent, Without a doubt!!

More
Bereamic
2011/01/22

Awesome Movie

More
Salubfoto
2011/01/23

It's an amazing and heartbreaking story.

More
Kien Navarro
2011/01/24

Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.

More
arjunflamingfeather
2011/01/25

Natalie and Kutcher are single in bed; 'No Strings Attached'. Importance of understanding films are with A like easy (A) but also like Hawthorne's Scarlet Letter, adult. Strictly allowing us not to watch movies until the year two thousand and fifteen because of Adult or dirty atmosphere. The television shows like Friends which is not adult but was not to be watched until two thousand fifteen are part of an undercover life that did not pass on from course to grades by two thousand eighteen. Recovering from finding 'No String Attached' with a suitable remedy comedy.

More
lorelaj2002
2011/01/26

I actually had a few laughs, and didnt really epect this kind of movie not to have kliche. But again, I was pretty disappointed when in the end we had to watch the lead's sister (a totally unimportant character who appeared in maybe 2 scenes during the movie) while having a child, without any epidural, screaming! This was solely to insult women and make men laugh at us!

More
Ersbel Oraph
2011/01/27

This is another comedy that is not funny. Nothing new. In the end the producers have to attach some labels so the public would know which stupid movie to choose. But why have a movie about sex to satisfy the prudes? Conventional nudity thrown in, but nothing special. I mean if you want to make a family movie, why not do something about children going to central park and doing say a treasure hunt?Contact me with Questions, Comments or Suggestions ryitfork @ bitmail.ch

More
acsbendi
2011/01/28

For starters, the answer for that question is because I expected a funny, light, sit-down-and-laugh comedy. But what'd I get? A boring, slow, and simply very bad teaching-movie-wannabe.I think the fact that I wanted to stop watching even after about 20 minutes kind of describes my image of this film. It was very hard to not do so, because the movie was full of boring, bad cut scenes which are often awkward, too. I could not laugh at all.I suspect the main problem here is that it wanted to be too serious. It certainly shouldn't have. The theme just doesn't allow that, at least not for a this kind of movie without a really surprising twist in the story. This is why the movie was so slow, instead of funny. This atmosphere spoiled the jokes. The creators must've felt it, and that's why they made a pathetic attempt after the actual ending (which, of course, is a predictable one).It also lacks a lot when it comes to the characters. They're very unnatural and badly depicted. The best example for that is Adam'coworker. I absolutely could not understand her part in the movie. The acting was also bad, but it hardly could've been better with other actors.Overall, I found this movie to be very artificial and empty. I advise you don't watch especially if you want a comedy. A better choice'd be Friends with Benefits of this kind.

More